Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
AI inconsistency reminds me of foids behaviour and further supports the idea of foids being insentient and algorithm controlled
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Actualized" data-source="post: 83916" data-attributes="member: 357"><p>I have always given foids too much credit in the sense that I would generally assume that what they say is what they actually mean</p><p>eg. if they turn down an offer to come back to mine I assume they truly don't want to but when I've been drunk enough to remove my sentience and just keep repeating the question, sometimes they'll agree after the fourth time of asking for example</p><p>I also allowed my ego to get too attched to online dating unresponsiveness but I heard someone tell me about a narcy gook manlet who would just spam "why" over and over again in text convos if they refused to agree to a meeting until it would cause a foid to agree to a meeting. </p><p>I also noticed myself that text game is a joke and that my default effort of wording things in a way that makes the questions interesting or draws reference to previous things they've said (hard to explain this exactly) is a complete waste of time and foids respond better the more you dumb things down.</p><p></p><p>Give them breadcrumbs of 90 IQ messages and talk to them like the insentient goon that they with the most basic possible sentence structure and it's more likely to lead to a meet.</p><p>Sending them any kind of creative or expressive sentence structure is a failo, you can't talk to them like you would your mate on discord, you have to text them as if you're 2 weeks into learning english. </p><p>This also supports the idea that spamming them with single words like "why?" when they don't first agree to what you want is likely more effective than anyone who makes an effort would like to beleive. </p><p></p><p>Whe making images with chatGPT, it often refuses to generate and says that it didn't meet the community guidlines. I repsond with "how" and sometimes it will generate immediately, sometimes I have to spam it a couple more times and it starts to work. </p><p>The fact is.. you're just dealing with an algorithm that isn't yet advanced enough to match the logic and consistencies one might expect from a sentient human, so just spam it with one word messages until the thing blocking progress stops popping up. </p><p>Foids are exactly the same, you're just dealing with an algorithm that is not yet advaced enough to meet the logic and consistencies one might expect from a sentient huMAN</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Actualized, post: 83916, member: 357"] I have always given foids too much credit in the sense that I would generally assume that what they say is what they actually mean eg. if they turn down an offer to come back to mine I assume they truly don't want to but when I've been drunk enough to remove my sentience and just keep repeating the question, sometimes they'll agree after the fourth time of asking for example I also allowed my ego to get too attched to online dating unresponsiveness but I heard someone tell me about a narcy gook manlet who would just spam "why" over and over again in text convos if they refused to agree to a meeting until it would cause a foid to agree to a meeting. I also noticed myself that text game is a joke and that my default effort of wording things in a way that makes the questions interesting or draws reference to previous things they've said (hard to explain this exactly) is a complete waste of time and foids respond better the more you dumb things down. Give them breadcrumbs of 90 IQ messages and talk to them like the insentient goon that they with the most basic possible sentence structure and it's more likely to lead to a meet. Sending them any kind of creative or expressive sentence structure is a failo, you can't talk to them like you would your mate on discord, you have to text them as if you're 2 weeks into learning english. This also supports the idea that spamming them with single words like "why?" when they don't first agree to what you want is likely more effective than anyone who makes an effort would like to beleive. Whe making images with chatGPT, it often refuses to generate and says that it didn't meet the community guidlines. I repsond with "how" and sometimes it will generate immediately, sometimes I have to spam it a couple more times and it starts to work. The fact is.. you're just dealing with an algorithm that isn't yet advanced enough to match the logic and consistencies one might expect from a sentient human, so just spam it with one word messages until the thing blocking progress stops popping up. Foids are exactly the same, you're just dealing with an algorithm that is not yet advaced enough to meet the logic and consistencies one might expect from a sentient huMAN [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
AI inconsistency reminds me of foids behaviour and further supports the idea of foids being insentient and algorithm controlled
Top