Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 80521" data-attributes="member: 656">What I presented is just examples and what I wrote is the tip of the iceberg.Maybe for you all I write is nonsense but I have decades of experience on these topics. I did not get introduced on the internet like most people. I was introduced to all of this when I was born. And I done 8 years of latin, 5 of greek, + 5 years course history of philosophy 3 years dante, + 2 years manzoni in HS basically I done humanities standard education.In the humanities we people learn these debates, we know them inside out and we are introed to the higher tier variant compared to jordan peterson or nick fuentes.Maybe for you is different and you got them on the internet. I got them in real life. And I can tell you that in my generation it was far far harder to tackle these topics because intellectuals are several times more intelligent than electronic celebrities. So what surprises me the most is despite ecelebs are so stupid, people believe their lies more. Instead when we dealt with intellectuals we disbelieved them and tried to challenge them.The internet public instead is terribly passive, and to me is astonishing. They have the advantage, but they choose to believe in all these lies and false framing of reality, false opposites, false premises, manufactured conclusions and prophecies. But the means to dispel the lies were never easier to use. And our adversaries are also weaker than ever before. Ecelebs like peterson or fuentes or whatever, theyre dumb, theyre weak, yet despite of that they have effects in society that no intellectual ever had, people believe all they say.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 80521, member: 656"] What I presented is just examples and what I wrote is the tip of the iceberg. Maybe for you all I write is nonsense but I have decades of experience on these topics. I did not get introduced on the internet like most people. I was introduced to all of this when I was born. And I done 8 years of latin, 5 of greek, + 5 years course history of philosophy 3 years dante, + 2 years manzoni in HS basically I done humanities standard education. In the humanities we people learn these debates, we know them inside out and we are introed to the higher tier variant compared to jordan peterson or nick fuentes. Maybe for you is different and you got them on the internet. I got them in real life. And I can tell you that in my generation it was far far harder to tackle these topics because intellectuals are several times more intelligent than electronic celebrities. So what surprises me the most is despite ecelebs are so stupid, people believe their lies more. Instead when we dealt with intellectuals we disbelieved them and tried to challenge them. The internet public instead is terribly passive, and to me is astonishing. They have the advantage, but they choose to believe in all these lies and false framing of reality, false opposites, false premises, manufactured conclusions and prophecies. But the means to dispel the lies were never easier to use. And our adversaries are also weaker than ever before. Ecelebs like peterson or fuentes or whatever, theyre dumb, theyre weak, yet despite of that they have effects in society that no intellectual ever had, people believe all they say. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread