Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/hai/ - Hobbies, Activities & Interests
ChatGPT on IuRcAc
Message
<blockquote data-quote="midnightsun" data-source="post: 64653" data-attributes="member: 463"><p>Short answer: **classic psychodynamic / personality-organization frameworks**, not trait or type systems.</p><p></p><p>The passage you quoted fits most cleanly into **Henry A. Murray → David Rapaport → Roy Schafer → Theodore Millon–adjacent** traditions, with the *single best umbrella* being:</p><p></p><p>> **Psychodynamic personality organization and ego-adjustment styles**, especially **schizoid / introversive adaptations**</p><p></p><p>Below is the clean map.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>## The framework that actually fits</p><p></p><p>### **Psychodynamic “Personality Organization & Adjustment Style” models**</p><p></p><p>These describe:</p><p></p><p>* **How the ego defends**</p><p>* **Where libido and attention are invested (internal vs external)**</p><p>* **How reality is mediated**</p><p>* **How tension, guilt, and impulse are managed**</p><p></p><p>They are *structural* models, not preference or trait models.</p><p></p><p>Your text uses:</p><p></p><p>* *introversive*</p><p>* *autosensuality*</p><p>* *primitive R orientation*</p><p>* *adjustment*</p><p>* *sublimation*</p><p>* *withdrawal*</p><p>* *reality contact*</p><p></p><p>Those terms are **native** to psychodynamic theory, not MBTI, Big Five, or Enneagram.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>## The most precise lineage of your text</p><p></p><p>### **Rorschach-based Ego Adjustment Typologies**</p><p></p><p>This looks almost directly lifted from:</p><p></p><p>* **Rapaport, Gill & Schafer (1946–1968)**</p><p>* **Exner-era Rorschach ego-function models**</p><p>* **Klopfer / Beck introversive–extratensive continuum**</p><p></p><p>Specifically:</p><p></p><p>* **Introversive (I) vs Extratensive (E)**</p><p>* **Control (C) vs Affect (A) dominance**</p><p>* **Reality testing (R) quality**</p><p>* **Primitive vs mature defenses**</p><p></p><p>The cryptic codes (e.g. *IuRcAc*) are classic **Rorschach ego-function shorthand**, not personality “types.”</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>## The best single label for this pattern</p><p></p><p>### **Schizoid Personality Organization (Psychodynamic sense)**</p><p></p><p>Important: *not DSM Schizoid PD*, but:</p><p></p><p>> A **schizoid ego organization** characterized by:</p><p>></p><p>> * Libidinal withdrawal into fantasy</p><p>> * Autosensual regulation</p><p>> * Self-sufficiency</p><p>> * Low object-need</p><p>> * Relative comfort in isolation</p><p>> * Potential for intellectual, mystical, or aesthetic sublimation</p><p></p><p>This is exactly how:</p><p></p><p>* **Fairbairn**</p><p>* **Guntrip**</p><p>* **Kernberg (lower-conflict schizoids)**</p><p> describe it.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>## Why common personality systems fail here</p><p></p><p>### **MBTI**</p><p></p><p>* Describes *preferences*, not defenses</p><p>* Cannot model reality distortion, autosensuality, or withdrawal economy</p><p></p><p>### **Big Five**</p><p></p><p>* Flattens pathology and adaptation into trait scores</p><p>* “Low extraversion + high openness” ≠ this structure</p><p></p><p>### **Enneagram**</p><p></p><p>* Describes motivational style, not ego structure</p><p>* Type 5 resembles this superficially but misses the depth of withdrawal dynamics</p><p></p><p>### **DSM**</p><p></p><p>* Symptom-based, not structural</p><p>* Misses internal experience entirely</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>## Closest modern frameworks that *do* work</p><p></p><p>### 1. **Psychodynamic Personality Organization (Kernberg)**</p><p></p><p>* Neurotic → Borderline → Psychotic spectrum</p><p>* Your text describes **schizoid organization spanning neurotic to psychotic levels**</p><p></p><p>### 2. **Object Relations Theory**</p><p></p><p>* Especially **Fairbairn / Guntrip**</p><p>* Withdrawal as primary adaptation</p><p>* Internal object world replacing external relations</p><p></p><p>### 3. **RDoC-adjacent dimensional psychopathology**</p><p></p><p>* Internalizing / detachment spectra</p><p>* But still less phenomenologically rich than classic psychodynamics</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>## One-sentence answer</p><p></p><p>If you wanted to name the *correct* framework:</p><p></p><p>> **Classic psychodynamic ego-adjustment and schizoid personality organization models (Rorschach-based, object-relations-informed), not personality typologies like MBTI or Big Five.**</p><p></p><p>If you want, I can:</p><p></p><p>* Translate this into **modern clinical language**</p><p>* Compare **schizoid vs autistic vs avoidant vs psychotic organization**</p><p>* Or show how this maps (imperfectly) onto **Enneagram 5 / INTx** without losing rigor</p><p></p><p>Just say where you want to go next.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="midnightsun, post: 64653, member: 463"] Short answer: **classic psychodynamic / personality-organization frameworks**, not trait or type systems. The passage you quoted fits most cleanly into **Henry A. Murray → David Rapaport → Roy Schafer → Theodore Millon–adjacent** traditions, with the *single best umbrella* being: > **Psychodynamic personality organization and ego-adjustment styles**, especially **schizoid / introversive adaptations** Below is the clean map. --- ## The framework that actually fits ### **Psychodynamic “Personality Organization & Adjustment Style” models** These describe: * **How the ego defends** * **Where libido and attention are invested (internal vs external)** * **How reality is mediated** * **How tension, guilt, and impulse are managed** They are *structural* models, not preference or trait models. Your text uses: * *introversive* * *autosensuality* * *primitive R orientation* * *adjustment* * *sublimation* * *withdrawal* * *reality contact* Those terms are **native** to psychodynamic theory, not MBTI, Big Five, or Enneagram. --- ## The most precise lineage of your text ### **Rorschach-based Ego Adjustment Typologies** This looks almost directly lifted from: * **Rapaport, Gill & Schafer (1946–1968)** * **Exner-era Rorschach ego-function models** * **Klopfer / Beck introversive–extratensive continuum** Specifically: * **Introversive (I) vs Extratensive (E)** * **Control (C) vs Affect (A) dominance** * **Reality testing (R) quality** * **Primitive vs mature defenses** The cryptic codes (e.g. *IuRcAc*) are classic **Rorschach ego-function shorthand**, not personality “types.” --- ## The best single label for this pattern ### **Schizoid Personality Organization (Psychodynamic sense)** Important: *not DSM Schizoid PD*, but: > A **schizoid ego organization** characterized by: > > * Libidinal withdrawal into fantasy > * Autosensual regulation > * Self-sufficiency > * Low object-need > * Relative comfort in isolation > * Potential for intellectual, mystical, or aesthetic sublimation This is exactly how: * **Fairbairn** * **Guntrip** * **Kernberg (lower-conflict schizoids)** describe it. --- ## Why common personality systems fail here ### **MBTI** * Describes *preferences*, not defenses * Cannot model reality distortion, autosensuality, or withdrawal economy ### **Big Five** * Flattens pathology and adaptation into trait scores * “Low extraversion + high openness” ≠ this structure ### **Enneagram** * Describes motivational style, not ego structure * Type 5 resembles this superficially but misses the depth of withdrawal dynamics ### **DSM** * Symptom-based, not structural * Misses internal experience entirely --- ## Closest modern frameworks that *do* work ### 1. **Psychodynamic Personality Organization (Kernberg)** * Neurotic → Borderline → Psychotic spectrum * Your text describes **schizoid organization spanning neurotic to psychotic levels** ### 2. **Object Relations Theory** * Especially **Fairbairn / Guntrip** * Withdrawal as primary adaptation * Internal object world replacing external relations ### 3. **RDoC-adjacent dimensional psychopathology** * Internalizing / detachment spectra * But still less phenomenologically rich than classic psychodynamics --- ## One-sentence answer If you wanted to name the *correct* framework: > **Classic psychodynamic ego-adjustment and schizoid personality organization models (Rorschach-based, object-relations-informed), not personality typologies like MBTI or Big Five.** If you want, I can: * Translate this into **modern clinical language** * Compare **schizoid vs autistic vs avoidant vs psychotic organization** * Or show how this maps (imperfectly) onto **Enneagram 5 / INTx** without losing rigor Just say where you want to go next. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/hai/ - Hobbies, Activities & Interests
ChatGPT on IuRcAc
Top
