Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
Concerning attitudes and forums and character
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quintilian" data-source="post: 82740" data-attributes="member: 10"><p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 22px">Is the average user capable of making reasonable post? Perhaps that question is not precisely the question at hand, but you will see as you read how these concepts and ideas apply to you and how that behavior can be understood and or acted upon for better or worse.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 22px">Freedom is often boasted as something important, but is it as valued and or important as claimed by those of forums or image boards? Perhaps to say that someone cares when there are no exact persons mentioned would be hard to believe, if you have been on the net long enough and been on forums or image boards you will will have seen a care for freedom- yet those very people are the ones who abuse it. I care for freedom, of a rational kind, we can engage in an odd and chaotic way and that is fair, but what I have seen from those users who's behaviors often are the strongest are done so for their sake and there sake alone without any concern whatsoever for those who it affects. For example, having been on neets and incel.is has shown me that it is a clique of men who run the show, no users are true participants, their opinions are like phantoms, real and yet cannot effect the physical realm; users on average tend to follow a sort of pattern, those reasonable, social, manipulative or simply mentally ill. That frame however cannot be held to high a use so I make it clear dear reader, that you may have seen those very people, they abuse others via through their anonymity, they have an a strong ability to invoke powerful negative emotions from others despite the fact it is often for their own laugh, those who are social are common average posters, there is not much to them other then physical experience or sharing of ideas; then there are those who are manipulative or mentally ill, their intent is to cause nothing good, they yearn for pleasure, a good laugh at the expense of others, they demand a stimulation of suffering. Those are often the strongest of the bunch, the result of them is either positions within a site, bans or constant harassment. What is the overall point? That user bases ought to observe for specific characteristics and weed out those who's character is evidently incapable of engaging with the wider forum.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 22px">Consider Dr. Robert Sapolsky and his Baboons, this troop was called the "</span></span><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">Kikarock" troop, putting it simply, the death of the aggressive alpha males allowed for the less dominant males and females to form a society in which dominance or submission did not exist, their health improved and for the first time in nature we have learned that the death of tyrants whether one or many, allows for a people to flourish, it is positive and predictable behavior that wins out and they we use violence, coercion or fear should perish and die alone. Emotional as that is, we are faced with the reality of the situation, can man live in peace or is he forever to fear his fellow man in a struggle for existence and the answer is no, but that he must have a set of characteristics by which he can defend himself, his family and his tribe.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">Morality is the foundation of a healthy society, dominance is the foundation for psychopathy; God does not will domination, Satan however does. I advocate, that in the current moment of history we are in, we should consider that if we ourselves whether on this forum and in general would survive, For forms of theories let fools contest, what is immediately administered and true is best. It is by this line we may find happy and golden ages here and now, and not here after; men are often accustomed to what they see and what they themselves believe they can do ergo if we can demonstrate that virtue is greater then vice our forums will be filled more with men instead of walking psychotic court cases. Those being of the following:</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">1.Truth</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">2.Trust</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">3.Predictability</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">4.Cooperation</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'">These four concepts at most can be demonstrated immediately, it is a willingness to set aside our own will for the moment and to put the needs of our group first, odd as this may seem to some, a willingness to be open and the capacity for trust worthy action first comes when our behavior is in alignment with those moral forces. I can only leave you with the idea in mind, that a better, happy and healthy forum is possible, but you have to know what you need to know in order to act; once that is obtained the only way in which we may descend into hell is by allowing those who would do wrong willingly to reign and for us to do nothing.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quintilian, post: 82740, member: 10"] [CENTER][FONT=times new roman][SIZE=6]Is the average user capable of making reasonable post? Perhaps that question is not precisely the question at hand, but you will see as you read how these concepts and ideas apply to you and how that behavior can be understood and or acted upon for better or worse.[/SIZE][/FONT][/CENTER] [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=6]Freedom is often boasted as something important, but is it as valued and or important as claimed by those of forums or image boards? Perhaps to say that someone cares when there are no exact persons mentioned would be hard to believe, if you have been on the net long enough and been on forums or image boards you will will have seen a care for freedom- yet those very people are the ones who abuse it. I care for freedom, of a rational kind, we can engage in an odd and chaotic way and that is fair, but what I have seen from those users who's behaviors often are the strongest are done so for their sake and there sake alone without any concern whatsoever for those who it affects. For example, having been on neets and incel.is has shown me that it is a clique of men who run the show, no users are true participants, their opinions are like phantoms, real and yet cannot effect the physical realm; users on average tend to follow a sort of pattern, those reasonable, social, manipulative or simply mentally ill. That frame however cannot be held to high a use so I make it clear dear reader, that you may have seen those very people, they abuse others via through their anonymity, they have an a strong ability to invoke powerful negative emotions from others despite the fact it is often for their own laugh, those who are social are common average posters, there is not much to them other then physical experience or sharing of ideas; then there are those who are manipulative or mentally ill, their intent is to cause nothing good, they yearn for pleasure, a good laugh at the expense of others, they demand a stimulation of suffering. Those are often the strongest of the bunch, the result of them is either positions within a site, bans or constant harassment. What is the overall point? That user bases ought to observe for specific characteristics and weed out those who's character is evidently incapable of engaging with the wider forum. Consider Dr. Robert Sapolsky and his Baboons, this troop was called the "[/SIZE][/FONT][SIZE=6][FONT=times new roman]Kikarock" troop, putting it simply, the death of the aggressive alpha males allowed for the less dominant males and females to form a society in which dominance or submission did not exist, their health improved and for the first time in nature we have learned that the death of tyrants whether one or many, allows for a people to flourish, it is positive and predictable behavior that wins out and they we use violence, coercion or fear should perish and die alone. Emotional as that is, we are faced with the reality of the situation, can man live in peace or is he forever to fear his fellow man in a struggle for existence and the answer is no, but that he must have a set of characteristics by which he can defend himself, his family and his tribe. Morality is the foundation of a healthy society, dominance is the foundation for psychopathy; God does not will domination, Satan however does. I advocate, that in the current moment of history we are in, we should consider that if we ourselves whether on this forum and in general would survive, For forms of theories let fools contest, what is immediately administered and true is best. It is by this line we may find happy and golden ages here and now, and not here after; men are often accustomed to what they see and what they themselves believe they can do ergo if we can demonstrate that virtue is greater then vice our forums will be filled more with men instead of walking psychotic court cases. Those being of the following: 1.Truth 2.Trust 3.Predictability 4.Cooperation These four concepts at most can be demonstrated immediately, it is a willingness to set aside our own will for the moment and to put the needs of our group first, odd as this may seem to some, a willingness to be open and the capacity for trust worthy action first comes when our behavior is in alignment with those moral forces. I can only leave you with the idea in mind, that a better, happy and healthy forum is possible, but you have to know what you need to know in order to act; once that is obtained the only way in which we may descend into hell is by allowing those who would do wrong willingly to reign and for us to do nothing.[/FONT][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
Concerning attitudes and forums and character
Top