Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Quintilian" data-source="post: 83154" data-attributes="member: 10">Whilst it has been given much conversation, the matter has not been given fair representation, it is easy to assume morality relative rather then objective; but no conversation is fair without understanding the choices at present.1. Morality comes from natural law which the creator has put in place to govern over the behaviors of intelligent sentient beings, that he has put these laws into effect for the maximum and optimal quality of life. Whereby, the quality of life is dependent upon the quality of one&#039;s behavior in part.2. Morality is subjective and not objective, when considering the behaviors and thoughts of morality, if it were evident that what is good and bad were true, why do many cultures find different behaviors which would be considered universal bad? For example, in Japan it is socially expected for one younger to give his seat to the eldest, where as in America it is little if ever done.3. Good &amp; evil exist as what is beneficial to one another; what is of my benefit may be disadvantages to you, reality therefore being amoral, how can you judge a behavior for being good or bad when circumstances may be completely against the notion?4. What is moral is what is legal, if it is deemed so by law and voted by legistlation, then it must be carried out. For when teo laws contradict it is the law that affects the greatest number, hence it is only right or wrong on a social basis.These options are written out as fair as possible, you may add your own, and thereby proper deduction can conclude for yourself.I stake my claim on number one.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Quintilian, post: 83154, member: 10"] [SIZE=6]Whilst it has been given much conversation, the matter has not been given fair representation, it is easy to assume morality relative rather then objective; but no conversation is fair without understanding the choices at present. 1. Morality comes from natural law which the creator has put in place to govern over the behaviors of intelligent sentient beings, that he has put these laws into effect for the maximum and optimal quality of life. Whereby, the quality of life is dependent upon the quality of one's behavior in part. 2. Morality is subjective and not objective, when considering the behaviors and thoughts of morality, if it were evident that what is good and bad were true, why do many cultures find different behaviors which would be considered universal bad? For example, in Japan it is socially expected for one younger to give his seat to the eldest, where as in America it is little if ever done. 3. Good & evil exist as what is beneficial to one another; what is of my benefit may be disadvantages to you, reality therefore being amoral, how can you judge a behavior for being good or bad when circumstances may be completely against the notion? 4. What is moral is what is legal, if it is deemed so by law and voted by legistlation, then it must be carried out. For when teo laws contradict it is the law that affects the greatest number, hence it is only right or wrong on a social basis. These options are written out as fair as possible, you may add your own, and thereby proper deduction can conclude for yourself. I stake my claim on number one.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread