Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
Do we need to stop referring to Isles Inhabitants as Hyper NT?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="6ft4" data-source="post: 77533" data-attributes="member: 357"><p>The general consensus on the NT Hierarchy is that Isles inhabitants are clear leaders at the top with mainland euros being way further behind, and Americans being somewhere in the mix but way more forgiving of a lack of ruthless NT than UKcels are </p><p></p><p>If the definition of NT is being ruthlessly low inhib and extraverted and verbally demeaning towards others who you feel you can socially mog, then yes Ukcels excel at this more than any other group</p><p></p><p>But if we take NT to mean the most typical form of behaviour, and use white people as a whole as the standard, then Islescels are actually far away from typical behaviour and are strong outliers. </p><p></p><p>If we limit NT to nation, then in the UK the most typical form of behaviour may be regarded as the banter obsessed, ruthless social dominance seeking persona..</p><p>But is it actually the most typical form of behaviour or just the most socially successful form of behaviour?</p><p></p><p>Why would the most socially successful form of behaviour on some shitty island that everyone who lives there hates be seen as the pinnacle of the most important aspect of behaviour which we label as NT?</p><p></p><p>UKcels are the best at finding chinks in others armour in the social interactions mogging game, meaning if you're not inherently inclined towards such jousting, you're at an automatic deficit, but why does this matter when the populations outside the shithole of the UK never have to play this game?</p><p></p><p>Every person born in the Isles who's not inclined that way has 0 reason to stay, while the people who are inclined that way still have 1000 reasons of their own to complain about the place and say why they want to leave. </p><p>If you meet the NT requirements for the Isles, stay and accept you got a better draw, if you aren't, leave and just forget about the whole "Hyper NT " requirement needed to not be seen as disabled in the UK and just go to live with any of the other billion people in the world of European descent. </p><p></p><p>I am questioning if we can really define NT on a scale where the hardest place to have social success as an aspie is automatically the most NT</p><p>What if peak NT actually sits between the extremes where ruthless low inhib UKcel behaviour is actually just one end of the extreme thus making it as far away from peak NT as typical aspies are. </p><p>What if peak NT is actually just middle of the road behaviour exhibited by an average American or euro, the 60million UKcels are just a weird anomaly </p><p></p><p>You could argue that UK behaviour is top of the NT hierarchy if it is capable of outmogging all other forms of behaviour directly, eg. the soulless insentient behaviour of retards like Ed Matthews who say "yalright darlin' " on repeat to some American foid who then gets sucked into his company while her attention gets taken away from her cuck BF who turns into a background character... but I feel like it can't be taken as confirmation of true reflection of behavioural superiority as it gets a heavy boost from novelty factor in unfamiliar environments and wouldn't necessarily trump the existing behaviour of the average white population if it was to go head to head on a large scale as many normie euro foids who aren't out looking for nightclub jesters would see it as retarded</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="6ft4, post: 77533, member: 357"] The general consensus on the NT Hierarchy is that Isles inhabitants are clear leaders at the top with mainland euros being way further behind, and Americans being somewhere in the mix but way more forgiving of a lack of ruthless NT than UKcels are If the definition of NT is being ruthlessly low inhib and extraverted and verbally demeaning towards others who you feel you can socially mog, then yes Ukcels excel at this more than any other group But if we take NT to mean the most typical form of behaviour, and use white people as a whole as the standard, then Islescels are actually far away from typical behaviour and are strong outliers. If we limit NT to nation, then in the UK the most typical form of behaviour may be regarded as the banter obsessed, ruthless social dominance seeking persona.. But is it actually the most typical form of behaviour or just the most socially successful form of behaviour? Why would the most socially successful form of behaviour on some shitty island that everyone who lives there hates be seen as the pinnacle of the most important aspect of behaviour which we label as NT? UKcels are the best at finding chinks in others armour in the social interactions mogging game, meaning if you're not inherently inclined towards such jousting, you're at an automatic deficit, but why does this matter when the populations outside the shithole of the UK never have to play this game? Every person born in the Isles who's not inclined that way has 0 reason to stay, while the people who are inclined that way still have 1000 reasons of their own to complain about the place and say why they want to leave. If you meet the NT requirements for the Isles, stay and accept you got a better draw, if you aren't, leave and just forget about the whole "Hyper NT " requirement needed to not be seen as disabled in the UK and just go to live with any of the other billion people in the world of European descent. I am questioning if we can really define NT on a scale where the hardest place to have social success as an aspie is automatically the most NT What if peak NT actually sits between the extremes where ruthless low inhib UKcel behaviour is actually just one end of the extreme thus making it as far away from peak NT as typical aspies are. What if peak NT is actually just middle of the road behaviour exhibited by an average American or euro, the 60million UKcels are just a weird anomaly You could argue that UK behaviour is top of the NT hierarchy if it is capable of outmogging all other forms of behaviour directly, eg. the soulless insentient behaviour of retards like Ed Matthews who say "yalright darlin' " on repeat to some American foid who then gets sucked into his company while her attention gets taken away from her cuck BF who turns into a background character... but I feel like it can't be taken as confirmation of true reflection of behavioural superiority as it gets a heavy boost from novelty factor in unfamiliar environments and wouldn't necessarily trump the existing behaviour of the average white population if it was to go head to head on a large scale as many normie euro foids who aren't out looking for nightclub jesters would see it as retarded [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
Do we need to stop referring to Isles Inhabitants as Hyper NT?
Top
