Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GGWP" data-source="post: 34580" data-attributes="member: 93">There&#039;s no point because it takes ages to make a meaningful dent in human genetics through selective breeding; e/acc &amp; transhumanism is more efficient at this stage. Why optimize humans if you can get machines to do all of the work for you? The godliest Aryan hyperchad dies instantly against a bullet to the head or chest shot by the scrawniest, most &#039;dysgenic&#039; chud. Furthermore there is the problem of genes not having linear effects on health at all and the definition of &#039;good&#039; genes&#039; being in flux constantly.Women select for tall thugs with heart disease and impulsive, violent tendencies. Sexual selection isn&#039;t eugenics. A &#039;well-oiled&#039; society would be comprised of low-consumption, agreeable, almost sexless, non-competitive, short, docile and obedient people; this is almost the opposite of what &#039;eugenicists&#039; typically advocate for, which are needlessly wasteful ubermensch.How would you implement eugenics, and for what purpose? What traits would you select for? My opinion is that health is a nebulous conquest given most 21st century ailments are man-made. Maybe some sort of protein to break down microplastics?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GGWP, post: 34580, member: 93"] There's no point because it takes ages to make a meaningful dent in human genetics through selective breeding; e/acc & transhumanism is more efficient at this stage. Why optimize humans if you can get machines to do all of the work for you? The godliest Aryan hyperchad dies instantly against a bullet to the head or chest shot by the scrawniest, most 'dysgenic' chud. Furthermore there is the problem of genes not having linear effects on health at all and the definition of 'good' genes' being in flux constantly. Women select for tall thugs with heart disease and impulsive, violent tendencies. Sexual selection isn't eugenics. A 'well-oiled' society would be comprised of low-consumption, agreeable, almost sexless, non-competitive, short, docile and obedient people; this is almost the opposite of what 'eugenicists' typically advocate for, which are needlessly wasteful ubermensch. How would you implement eugenics, and for what purpose? What traits would you select for? My opinion is that health is a nebulous conquest given most 21st century ailments are man-made. Maybe some sort of protein to break down microplastics? [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread