Evola describes the modern woman perfectly

[Autistic_tendencies2]

of psychological sadism in those women of today who "make a great show of their bodies but apply a symbolic placard bearing the words 'Do not touch.'" Sexual tormentresses of this kind are found everywhere: the girl who wears a minute bikini, the married woman with a provocatively low neckline, the young woman who walks along the street wiggling her hips in very tight pants or in a miniskirt that leaves more than half of her thighs exposed and who wants to be looked at but not touched—all of these types are capable of showing anger.

 

[Schwarzwald]

of psychological sadism in those women of today who "make a great show of their bodies but apply a symbolic placard bearing the words 'Do not touch.'" Sexual tormentresses of this kind are found everywhere: the girl who wears a minute bikini, the married woman with a provocatively low neckline, the young woman who walks along the street wiggling her hips in very tight pants or in a miniskirt that leaves more than half of her thighs exposed and who wants to be looked at but not touched—all of these types are capable of showing anger.

Evola was right on so much it's wild and his idea of the aristocratic soul is really on point. He is not in any way my favorite writer or philosopher but the modern violence and decay we see to see today was predicted pretty much on the nose.

To think of all these shootings and mass acts of violence as lost young men looking for meaning and anarchist just trying to shit up the world.

 

[porco-dddio]

I desecrated him and all the other right wing authors you will read next. Just so you know, all what you think from now on has been debunked already. By me. I destroyed it all years ago.

 

[Depresso]

of psychological sadism in those women of today who "make a great show of their bodies but apply a symbolic placard bearing the words 'Do not touch.'" Sexual tormentresses of this kind are found everywhere: the girl who wears a minute bikini, the married woman with a provocatively low neckline, the young woman who walks along the street wiggling her hips in very tight pants or in a miniskirt that leaves more than half of her thighs exposed and who wants to be looked at but not touched—all of these types are capable of showing anger.

Before there's talk about rejecting modernity, whatever that means because modernity just keeps on changing like a shifting goal post, how would you define your own 'happiness' and how to achieve and maintain that? Life was not easy for a long time and it's still not a cake walk today but you've got more freedom to personalise your own lifestyle now than before. Before women and much before politics, you have to define your own happiness or else there's nothing to defend and protect. Do you deserve to be possessed by angry politics ghosts?

I say reject radicalism for now, especially is there's an unmentioned mental condition or complex there.

There is a post on Evola in the thread below but the TLDR is that he saw men falling into meat grinders at scale and got veteran's depression after the war.

Serious - Do we even need the Elites?

First: What do you think the elites are? Do you see them on TV or are they invisible and secret? Who do you think they are? Second: Do you think we need the Elites? Will we always need them? Is it part of being human to need elites?

elysianfields.se

Choose yourself.

 

[Schwarzwald]