Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cosmicx16" data-source="post: 71875" data-attributes="member: 292">I didn&#039;t have much to add and didn&#039;t want to be out of my depth making brazen statements about the work with my low IQ and 0 knowledge of molecular biology, sorry. I reiterate that point now, seeing that the author of this work stated it took him 10 years: 10 years, to conclusively perfect his approach in organizing and expressing the logic of the standard codex into the presentation seen within the second graph (taken from his words).Despite not understanding it fully, I was able to appreciate the simplicity with which the logical partitions organizing graph data were expressed, and as he even said in the article, &quot;accurate is simple&quot; so his simple result does truly reveal the precision and expertise of his science. I just had a good time reading the full article. His full explanations of necessary probabilities/events from history required for DNA&#039;s known arrangement, were very explicate where even I could grasp it. I&#039;ll quote it here.This whole work is engineering porn. It&#039;s definitely a precendent for my experience, of conceptual delivery unconfounded and simplified without omitting any required components</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cosmicx16, post: 71875, member: 292"] I didn't have much to add and didn't want to be out of my depth making brazen statements about the work with my low IQ and 0 knowledge of molecular biology, sorry. I reiterate that point now, seeing that the author of this work stated it took him 10 years: 10 years, to conclusively perfect his approach in organizing and expressing the logic of the standard codex into the presentation seen within the second graph (taken from his words). Despite not understanding it fully, I was able to appreciate the simplicity with which the logical partitions organizing graph data were expressed, and as he even said in the article, "accurate is simple" so his simple result does truly reveal the precision and expertise of his science. I just had a good time reading the full article. His full explanations of necessary probabilities/events from history required for DNA's known arrangement, were very explicate where even I could grasp it. I'll quote it here. This whole work is engineering porn. It's definitely a precendent for my experience, of conceptual delivery unconfounded and simplified without omitting any required components [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread