Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 83529" data-attributes="member: 656">For example, flat earth violates any principle of rationality. If I am allowed to use a source, whatever that is, then you should be allowed to use the same source. So we use same standard for determine what the fuck is true. If they say bible is authoritative, I can say ok. So they quote some selection of passages, they interpret it like shit, and they say god has made the earth flat like a pizza. Then I quote another passage helped by chatGPT and it says earth is a spinning ball and I use the same dishonest freedom to interpret it. Another example. They reject NASA pics because &quot;collage&quot; or &quot;NASA CGI&quot;. Fine, then why they use youtube videos as evidence? If they say &quot;you believe scientists are god&quot;, its another proof of their immorality and dishonesty. Theyre lucky god isnt real, because such immorality would make them burn in hell if god was a thing. My incel thesis is we men invented women. I came up with it simply reading over 250 feminist books. I realized women do not exist. Womanhood is not real. I made it up. Why? bcause in feminist writings they only say &quot;this is not a woman&quot;. But they dont define it, and I realized they cant. When matt walsh asks wht is a woman, he probably does not knows, he doesnt reads feminism because hes lowIQ, but he was focused on trannies and SJWs. Point being, there isnt an answer, only peterson in his documentary had it right. He said: marry and find out. WHich is true, even if peterson intends it like a conservative. All conservatives with an old timey mindset think that women are defined socially after mariage. I lived in a conservative town, I knw this is true, they too taught me to never call &quot;woman&quot; any girl my age unmarried. So its a real thing, and peterson being slightly more educated than avg probably knows it. Instead I think matt walsh doesnt knows it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 83529, member: 656"] For example, flat earth violates any principle of rationality. If I am allowed to use a source, whatever that is, then you should be allowed to use the same source. So we use same standard for determine what the fuck is true. If they say bible is authoritative, I can say ok. So they quote some selection of passages, they interpret it like shit, and they say god has made the earth flat like a pizza. Then I quote another passage helped by chatGPT and it says earth is a spinning ball and I use the same dishonest freedom to interpret it. Another example. They reject NASA pics because "collage" or "NASA CGI". Fine, then why they use youtube videos as evidence? If they say "you believe scientists are god", its another proof of their immorality and dishonesty. Theyre lucky god isnt real, because such immorality would make them burn in hell if god was a thing. My incel thesis is we men invented women. I came up with it simply reading over 250 feminist books. I realized women do not exist. Womanhood is not real. I made it up. Why? bcause in feminist writings they only say "this is not a woman". But they dont define it, and I realized they cant. When matt walsh asks wht is a woman, he probably does not knows, he doesnt reads feminism because hes lowIQ, but he was focused on trannies and SJWs. Point being, there isnt an answer, only peterson in his documentary had it right. He said: marry and find out. WHich is true, even if peterson intends it like a conservative. All conservatives with an old timey mindset think that women are defined socially after mariage. I lived in a conservative town, I knw this is true, they too taught me to never call "woman" any girl my age unmarried. So its a real thing, and peterson being slightly more educated than avg probably knows it. Instead I think matt walsh doesnt knows it. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread