Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 72856" data-attributes="member: 544">You asked what I mean by “occult”, fair question, because the term gets sloppy.For this thread, I’m using it broadly to mean any system that treats the simulation as hackable: whether that’s ceremonial magic (Picatrix), anti‑cosmic deletion (Sitra Achra), cybernetic rootkit stuff (Mace), or the academic study of why humans keep building these systems (Goodrick‑Clarke, Hanegraaff).The through line isn’t belief in demons or entities. It’s the recurring human impulse to treat reality as malleable through symbols, timing, and focused intent. Some people call that magic, some call it psychology, some call it a trap. I’m less interested in the label than in what happens when you expose different people to the same text. Hence the thread.So when you say “darkness corrupts and enslaves”&nbsp; I’m not arguing against that. I’m asking, is it the text itself that corrupts, or is it the posture you bring to it? Someone could read Sitra Achra and see a philosophy of radical autonomy. Someone else could read it and start collecting edgy memes. Same book, different outcomes. That’s what I’m here to watch.You also said “If these things work, big if” exactly. I’m not claiming they do. I’m treating them as thought experiments, pressure tests for the mind. If the “if” scares you, that’s interesting in itself.[ATTACH=full]14394[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 72856, member: 544"] You asked what I mean by “occult”, fair question, because the term gets sloppy. For this thread, I’m using it broadly to mean any system that treats the simulation as hackable: whether that’s ceremonial magic (Picatrix), anti‑cosmic deletion (Sitra Achra), cybernetic rootkit stuff (Mace), or the academic study of why humans keep building these systems (Goodrick‑Clarke, Hanegraaff). The through line isn’t belief in demons or entities. It’s the recurring human impulse to treat reality as malleable through symbols, timing, and focused intent. Some people call that magic, some call it psychology, some call it a trap. I’m less interested in the label than in what happens when you expose different people to the same text. Hence the thread. So when you say “darkness corrupts and enslaves” I’m not arguing against that. I’m asking, is it the text itself that corrupts, or is it the posture you bring to it? Someone could read Sitra Achra and see a philosophy of radical autonomy. Someone else could read it and start collecting edgy memes. Same book, different outcomes. That’s what I’m here to watch. You also said “If these things work, big if” exactly. I’m not claiming they do. I’m treating them as thought experiments, pressure tests for the mind. If the “if” scares you, that’s interesting in itself. [ATTACH type="full"]14394[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread