- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 713
- Thread Author
- #1
I thin hippies are right and all you gotta do in life is define yourself, but they frame it as "find who you are" or "find the purpose of your existence". And I think people are pissed at hippies because they are very mellowy and speak with guru attitude and often moralize others with some pretense of knowledge.
However, if you step back a little, and you consider the single hippy takes on life and humanity, not all are wrong and I think their idea of using your life to build yourself is simply true.
So hear me out. When I faced people who call you "racist", all you gotta do is dig around and discover all the usages of the word "racist" and discover who invented it. It was a journalist, who slandered people. A guy, pretended to criticize racial sciences by simply presuming that if you have an interest in race then you are race-ist. You are ideologically convinced that humans can be described by races.
And the journalist didnt stop here, he also mixed unrelatd ideas of bigotry and concepts such as "superiority" going around saying that if you think races exist then you secretely do it for hidden agenda, and you have to be bigot. Now if you start presuming someone else has "hidden agendas" you can narrate all the bullshit you want and its all unverifiable, its like when the UFO community talks about tunnels and aliens. Aliens dont exist, so they can narrate what they want. You can invent the "secret agenda of aliens" now, and who can disprove you? Afterall aliens dont exist.
So the journalist didnt demonstrate it, just said it. You can say a lot of things, and another one that was said is that interest in race makes you "supremacist". Was ever provided some sort of evidence? Of course not, its simply a dogma.
Now if normies follow hippymaxing, we can fix this debate and force them to offer proof in front of tribunals. An we can fix all debates based on words owned by collectives, words like "terrorism" will be questioned. Narratives of journalists will be shut down. Like, when they put forward the theory of "anti-vaccinists", we have to put pressure on them to force them to present the theory of how someone can be "anti vaccinist".
Once they present their model or their theory or their essay or their articulate case, we take it and dismember it. If you have a model to work on, you can falsify it now. Its like with flat earth, they can go on and on forever if they dont have a model. So the task of the scientist has been to force them to present a model. Once you have it, then you can destroy it, but not before then.
Instead of accepting their dogma, we can question it, reframe it and offer our theory. And we will notice at some point we are the only ones with a theory or a model. And the guys who spam dogma have no theory and no model, they simply repeat words.
Instead what do normies do? Well, they be defined by these labels. They become racist. They react to the slander, they sense the hostility and the way they react is simply by embodying the slander and opposing it with an equally as irrational stereotype. So this is the process by which normies are often scapegoated. They accept the dogma by participating in this frame where they have war of false opposites.
It would have been much better if you hippymaxed and you did a soul searching journey and you defined yourself. So when you come to a point in your life you have some level of control over your identity, you will not really be moved by slander and you will have the mental clarity to respond to dogma in a proper way.
Now, till someone is in a norme fecal state, he will always embody a stereotype, like "antisemite". So I purpose we reframe hippymaxing, simply take the good ideas of hippy, and abstract them away from their aesthetics and mellowy attitudes, remove all the moralizer attitudes and remove all pretense of knowledge, and create an hippymaxing model that can be applied for the benefit of the common man.
Common men hate hippies, I hate them too. But once you take possession of their revelations, you will see they have some methods to empower you.
However, if you step back a little, and you consider the single hippy takes on life and humanity, not all are wrong and I think their idea of using your life to build yourself is simply true.
So hear me out. When I faced people who call you "racist", all you gotta do is dig around and discover all the usages of the word "racist" and discover who invented it. It was a journalist, who slandered people. A guy, pretended to criticize racial sciences by simply presuming that if you have an interest in race then you are race-ist. You are ideologically convinced that humans can be described by races.
And the journalist didnt stop here, he also mixed unrelatd ideas of bigotry and concepts such as "superiority" going around saying that if you think races exist then you secretely do it for hidden agenda, and you have to be bigot. Now if you start presuming someone else has "hidden agendas" you can narrate all the bullshit you want and its all unverifiable, its like when the UFO community talks about tunnels and aliens. Aliens dont exist, so they can narrate what they want. You can invent the "secret agenda of aliens" now, and who can disprove you? Afterall aliens dont exist.
So the journalist didnt demonstrate it, just said it. You can say a lot of things, and another one that was said is that interest in race makes you "supremacist". Was ever provided some sort of evidence? Of course not, its simply a dogma.
Now if normies follow hippymaxing, we can fix this debate and force them to offer proof in front of tribunals. An we can fix all debates based on words owned by collectives, words like "terrorism" will be questioned. Narratives of journalists will be shut down. Like, when they put forward the theory of "anti-vaccinists", we have to put pressure on them to force them to present the theory of how someone can be "anti vaccinist".
Once they present their model or their theory or their essay or their articulate case, we take it and dismember it. If you have a model to work on, you can falsify it now. Its like with flat earth, they can go on and on forever if they dont have a model. So the task of the scientist has been to force them to present a model. Once you have it, then you can destroy it, but not before then.
Instead of accepting their dogma, we can question it, reframe it and offer our theory. And we will notice at some point we are the only ones with a theory or a model. And the guys who spam dogma have no theory and no model, they simply repeat words.
Instead what do normies do? Well, they be defined by these labels. They become racist. They react to the slander, they sense the hostility and the way they react is simply by embodying the slander and opposing it with an equally as irrational stereotype. So this is the process by which normies are often scapegoated. They accept the dogma by participating in this frame where they have war of false opposites.
It would have been much better if you hippymaxed and you did a soul searching journey and you defined yourself. So when you come to a point in your life you have some level of control over your identity, you will not really be moved by slander and you will have the mental clarity to respond to dogma in a proper way.
Now, till someone is in a norme fecal state, he will always embody a stereotype, like "antisemite". So I purpose we reframe hippymaxing, simply take the good ideas of hippy, and abstract them away from their aesthetics and mellowy attitudes, remove all the moralizer attitudes and remove all pretense of knowledge, and create an hippymaxing model that can be applied for the benefit of the common man.
Common men hate hippies, I hate them too. But once you take possession of their revelations, you will see they have some methods to empower you.
