Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 81356" data-attributes="member: 656">Very good. I think if you are opposing an irrational dogma, you need a model to work on. Some communities gain rhetorical dominance not by presenting theories or models or incel shitpost essays, but by staying in a fluid narrative mode where they slander and spam dogma and bullshit. In that mode, they can continually reinterpret anything, which makes them very hard to pin down and refute. Hippymaxing is not a joke in this case, because it forces you to deliberately self-narrativize. Youre not passive any more. When you do it, you become author of your identity. Now, lets not get caught on some philosophy BS I dont want to discuss possibility of &quot;ultimate individual&quot;, lets keep it grounded in reality, we simply presume anyone can achieve a basic level of hippymaxing and becoming &quot;ultimate individual&quot; is a literary experiment. When the incel hippymaxer is the author of his identity, he just became more resistant to the external normie collective identity framing attempts, and this includes also slander and dogma. Of any type. Simply, their attempts to narrativize you will clash with what you already internalized in your self-model. You modeled yourself, you became able to present to society a &quot;theory&quot; of yourself. Society cant refute a theory about yourself, not in the same way it can refute a claim about the external world at least. Society can only contest your self narrative with counter evidence about the way you act or how you demonstrate your choices. You can be told how your act is perceived by others or if your theory is coherent with the behavior that they observe. So your model isnt going to be really bomb proof, but what I think hippymaxing does is train you to reach this superior level of humanity where you gained methods to resist slander and dogma effectively. It wont make you a piece of shit rotter playing shit guitar themes if you dont want to. Its the answer to normie aggression.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 81356, member: 656"] Very good. I think if you are opposing an irrational dogma, you need a model to work on. Some communities gain rhetorical dominance not by presenting theories or models or incel shitpost essays, but by staying in a fluid narrative mode where they slander and spam dogma and bullshit. In that mode, they can continually reinterpret anything, which makes them very hard to pin down and refute. Hippymaxing is not a joke in this case, because it forces you to deliberately self-narrativize. Youre not passive any more. When you do it, you become author of your identity. Now, lets not get caught on some philosophy BS I dont want to discuss possibility of "ultimate individual", lets keep it grounded in reality, we simply presume anyone can achieve a basic level of hippymaxing and becoming "ultimate individual" is a literary experiment. When the incel hippymaxer is the author of his identity, he just became more resistant to the external normie collective identity framing attempts, and this includes also slander and dogma. Of any type. Simply, their attempts to narrativize you will clash with what you already internalized in your self-model. You modeled yourself, you became able to present to society a "theory" of yourself. Society cant refute a theory about yourself, not in the same way it can refute a claim about the external world at least. Society can only contest your self narrative with counter evidence about the way you act or how you demonstrate your choices. You can be told how your act is perceived by others or if your theory is coherent with the behavior that they observe. So your model isnt going to be really bomb proof, but what I think hippymaxing does is train you to reach this superior level of humanity where you gained methods to resist slander and dogma effectively. It wont make you a piece of shit rotter playing shit guitar themes if you dont want to. Its the answer to normie aggression. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread