Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Tartarus
How did you debunk Baudrillard?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 85040" data-attributes="member: 656"><p>S = signs</p><p>R = reality</p><p>f = transformation</p><p>n = iteration</p><p></p><p>The structure of plato model is easy. Its f: S -> R</p><p></p><p>The iteration shows that R can be accessed.</p><p></p><p>here limit behavior.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]18378[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Says appearance misleads you but there is reality out there. With more knowledge you correct your perceptions. At the end of your journey there will be truth.</p><p></p><p>Lets use baudrillard model now.</p><p></p><p>f: S→S is what he wants us to do . We have to pretend there is no reality or if there is then is not accessible.</p><p></p><p>So the iteration is a loop.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]18379[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>How you interpret it: show reality is not accessible. "muh meaning" circulates around various systems that represent reality and each of these layer refers to other layers so on...</p><p></p><p>In matrix instead we have Reality 1 and Reality 2</p><p></p><p>You can create a map of reality in matrix. You can say first reality leads to the second. Matrix presumes a property of invertibility.</p><p></p><p>Define map of reality M</p><p></p><p>M: Reality1 -> Reality2 (first reality points at second reality )</p><p></p><p>Here you invert reality </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]18380[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>You can invert reality, or escape it, pick one of the 2 (cypher did it)</p><p></p><p>Here made summary with chatGPT.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]18381[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 85040, member: 656"] S = signs R = reality f = transformation n = iteration The structure of plato model is easy. Its f: S -> R The iteration shows that R can be accessed. here limit behavior. [ATTACH type="full" alt="fmlll.jpg"]18378[/ATTACH] Says appearance misleads you but there is reality out there. With more knowledge you correct your perceptions. At the end of your journey there will be truth. Lets use baudrillard model now. f: S→S is what he wants us to do . We have to pretend there is no reality or if there is then is not accessible. So the iteration is a loop. [ATTACH type="full" alt="funct.jpg"]18379[/ATTACH] How you interpret it: show reality is not accessible. "muh meaning" circulates around various systems that represent reality and each of these layer refers to other layers so on... In matrix instead we have Reality 1 and Reality 2 You can create a map of reality in matrix. You can say first reality leads to the second. Matrix presumes a property of invertibility. Define map of reality M M: Reality1 -> Reality2 (first reality points at second reality ) Here you invert reality [ATTACH type="full" alt="invert.jpg"]18380[/ATTACH] You can invert reality, or escape it, pick one of the 2 (cypher did it) Here made summary with chatGPT. [ATTACH type="full" alt="cgpttt.jpg"]18381[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Tartarus
How did you debunk Baudrillard?
Top
