Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="somethingtobelievein" data-source="post: 37451" data-attributes="member: 90">Disagree.&nbsp; It exists.&nbsp; Manletmachine could&#039;ve stopped being retarded, hence I don&#039;t feel bad for him. He wasn&#039;t &quot;determined at birth&quot; to be someone incapable of stopping himself.100% determinism denies any range of outcomes.Yes, bad genetics, bad place of birth, etc., are all against you. Statistically, the person with worse genetics will lose more of the time.&nbsp; Not all of the time, and in there are choices to be made which can move the odds. People who won&#039;t accept this don&#039;t want to face their own failures.I know we&#039;re far past the original post now but still, getting rid of &quot;unideal&quot; traits as you define would wipe out most of the NEETs and Incels lol. A big one would be if you could isolate a predisposition towards being lazy, a utilitarian society would wipe them out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="somethingtobelievein, post: 37451, member: 90"] Disagree. It exists. Manletmachine could've stopped being retarded, hence I don't feel bad for him. He wasn't "determined at birth" to be someone incapable of stopping himself. 100% determinism denies any range of outcomes. Yes, bad genetics, bad place of birth, etc., are all against you. Statistically, the person with worse genetics will lose more of the time. Not all of the time, and in there are choices to be made which can move the odds. People who won't accept this don't want to face their own failures. I know we're far past the original post now but still, getting rid of "unideal" traits as you define would wipe out most of the NEETs and Incels lol. A big one would be if you could isolate a predisposition towards being lazy, a utilitarian society would wipe them out. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread