Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 84442" data-attributes="member: 656">Lookism does not have &quot;rules&quot; so I don&#039;t get to disagree with the single practices expressed by the community. But over time lookism manifested some ethical principles and common behaviors. Remaining general, I can observe and criticize some of these things. - ascension and validation. I consider it gynocentric misogyny. The idea women have a right to make you &quot;valid&quot; is very dangerous to society, its scary if you think about it. There is a group of men who is very committed and they ACT on this belief. Im not OK with it. Some lookismcels express the romantic ethos of the pretty boy manipulator or the chivalrous aesthetic of anime where you have to pursue a situation where theres women who admire men for their beauty. In that case is good. Lookismcelling isnt all bad. - the rating of men faces. I consider it bullshit, especially taking into account the lack of self esteem of teens. - the rating of women faces and concept of &quot;looksmatch&quot; . It is Communist to tell someone whos his &quot;perfect match&quot;. - antiporn. The antiporn tendency coincides with face rating habits. If you care about face, it makes sense you dont want porn to reveal the truth about human bodies. - nofapping. This curious debased practice is the main ethics of the looking community. They preach original Christianity beliefs that men shouldnt pleasure themselves. &quot;Its bad&quot;. I dont know why they do it, nobody explained it to me. If I have to guess, I think they dont have energy, they lack power. Curious thing bout nofap is they dont shut up about it. Theyre some sort of vegan that wants everyone around him to &quot;respect their beliefs&quot;, it is becoming an unnerving cope. - they target teenagers. All lookism is a psyop targeted at the most vulnerable teens. They have an army of grifters. - some are payed by surgeons to promote plastic surgery among teens. - mog battle. Its a practice that I disagree with. Mainly because when you observe it from outside it makes you feel bad. Its evident that its substitute for confrontation in real life. Makes them look very bad and lost in life. Mog battle isnt all bad. I know a tranny called femyoz whos doing mog battles for fun, and nobody gets slandered. The tranny is simply having fun with the concept, turning the inherently malevolent lookism culture into something to laugh at. But on avg, the concept &quot;mogging battle&quot; seems very bad, antisocial and symptom of bigger stuff. A man who wants to find a challenge can always go do some MMA. Whoever resorts to &quot;mogging battles&quot; must be very lost and impotent. Its not even &quot;funny&quot; to watch. - repetitive mantras. I call this &quot;culture of performative stupidity&quot;. Most people are not stupid but they pretend to be. Among people who pretend to be stupid, some are for real. There was that guy weev who was a jew from MIT, he had 140 IQ. He was performing stupidity but it was evident to all he wasn&#039;t dumb. On lookism is the reverse, they perform stupid, but the majority are also stupid for real.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 84442, member: 656"] Lookism does not have "rules" so I don't get to disagree with the single practices expressed by the community. But over time lookism manifested some ethical principles and common behaviors. Remaining general, I can observe and criticize some of these things. - ascension and validation. I consider it gynocentric misogyny. The idea women have a right to make you "valid" is very dangerous to society, its scary if you think about it. There is a group of men who is very committed and they ACT on this belief. Im not OK with it. Some lookismcels express the romantic ethos of the pretty boy manipulator or the chivalrous aesthetic of anime where you have to pursue a situation where theres women who admire men for their beauty. In that case is good. Lookismcelling isnt all bad. - the rating of men faces. I consider it bullshit, especially taking into account the lack of self esteem of teens. - the rating of women faces and concept of "looksmatch" . It is Communist to tell someone whos his "perfect match". - antiporn. The antiporn tendency coincides with face rating habits. If you care about face, it makes sense you dont want porn to reveal the truth about human bodies. - nofapping. This curious debased practice is the main ethics of the looking community. They preach original Christianity beliefs that men shouldnt pleasure themselves. "Its bad". I dont know why they do it, nobody explained it to me. If I have to guess, I think they dont have energy, they lack power. Curious thing bout nofap is they dont shut up about it. Theyre some sort of vegan that wants everyone around him to "respect their beliefs", it is becoming an unnerving cope. - they target teenagers. All lookism is a psyop targeted at the most vulnerable teens. They have an army of grifters. - some are payed by surgeons to promote plastic surgery among teens. - mog battle. Its a practice that I disagree with. Mainly because when you observe it from outside it makes you feel bad. Its evident that its substitute for confrontation in real life. Makes them look very bad and lost in life. Mog battle isnt all bad. I know a tranny called femyoz whos doing mog battles for fun, and nobody gets slandered. The tranny is simply having fun with the concept, turning the inherently malevolent lookism culture into something to laugh at. But on avg, the concept "mogging battle" seems very bad, antisocial and symptom of bigger stuff. A man who wants to find a challenge can always go do some MMA. Whoever resorts to "mogging battles" must be very lost and impotent. Its not even "funny" to watch. - repetitive mantras. I call this "culture of performative stupidity". Most people are not stupid but they pretend to be. Among people who pretend to be stupid, some are for real. There was that guy weev who was a jew from MIT, he had 140 IQ. He was performing stupidity but it was evident to all he wasn't dumb. On lookism is the reverse, they perform stupid, but the majority are also stupid for real. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread