Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 86402" data-attributes="member: 544">Fine if you insist but repeating my views to multiple people does get tiering.I reject playing this pill game like it&#039;s gospel.The mechanics?Sure, hypergamy, looks fade, life&#039;s rigged, dog eat dog, plenty of it&#039;s already over for certain paths. None of that shocks me.But knowing a pattern isn&#039;t the same as having the mechanism. Medieval doctors knew dirty hands were bad for wounds, that didn&#039;t make them germ theory scientists.Broken clock&#039;s right twice a day, and a broken ideology can be crammed into anything if you&#039;re willing to swallow it whole without asking why. This whole pill discourse has been left out to rot too long, it&#039;s post post post ironic at this point, and pretending it&#039;s &quot;real&quot; now is really just choosing to play by someone else&#039;s rules when you know damn well you don&#039;t have to.Best part of the framework? it takes losers out of the game before they even play. Ugly or whatever? Cool, you&#039;re the side character now, an NPC eating black/red pills and following a script while sitting on a track.Cool story.And is it really shocking that some 10/10 is an evil manipulative whore? Where&#039;s the deep message there?I like women for themselves, not a fat slob who doesn&#039;t care for herself, sure, but not a checklist either.When I was dating(I do not now) it was a Korean art professor ten years older,beautiful to me, sharp, funny, used to be a tattoo artist, personality that actually clicked.That&#039;s a mate.Not a checklist some other guy handed me, not &quot;the standard&quot; according to some rando online.I&#039;m the standard!I make the list!I&#039;m player one in my life.I don&#039;t want a robot, a cold distant partner, or someone whose whole personality is makeup and Instagram and K pop.Why would anyone chase that and call it winning?No hate we can disagree all day...But what&#039;s really the move at the end of the day beyond &quot;it&#039;s over&quot;?Something that that just started rattling in my head as I was punching this up with my thumbs since I&#039;m on my phone...why don&#039;t people who buy fully into this ever test it against reality, even at the bottom of the SMV scale?From my perspective for a lot of people the framework isn&#039;t really a claim about dating.It&#039;s a pre built explanation for why trying is pointless, like I said out of the game before it even starts. It gives them an excuse to be a loser and that it&#039;s not there fault it&#039;s something outside of there control.I don&#039;t think that goes for everything or everyone (not here not you just a generalization) but it surely does for the online intellectual who seems to have got it all figured out doesn&#039;t it?so testing it would risk losing the explanation, not just risk another rejection.It&#039;s a security blanket, that&#039;s harder to give up than a date.[ATTACH=full]18959[/ATTACH]TL:DR?ITS A BAD MODEL OF REALITY. ITS JUNK DATA. THE IDEA THAT EVERYONE WHO IS A NORMIE IS WRONG BUT MADE IT WORK AND ONLY THE BIG BRAIN DARK INTELLECTUAL ONLINE MASTERS OF THE RAINBOW OF PILLS ARE RIGHT BUT COULDN&#039;T MAKE IT WORK IS SO COMICAL I CAN&#039;T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.[ATTACH=full]18959[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 86402, member: 544"] Fine if you insist but repeating my views to multiple people does get tiering. I reject playing this pill game like it's gospel. The mechanics? Sure, hypergamy, looks fade, life's rigged, dog eat dog, plenty of it's already over for certain paths. None of that shocks me. But knowing a pattern isn't the same as having the mechanism. Medieval doctors knew dirty hands were bad for wounds, that didn't make them germ theory scientists. Broken clock's right twice a day, and a broken ideology can be crammed into anything if you're willing to swallow it whole without asking why. This whole pill discourse has been left out to rot too long, it's post post post ironic at this point, and pretending it's "real" now is really just choosing to play by someone else's rules when you know damn well you don't have to. Best part of the framework? it takes losers out of the game before they even play. Ugly or whatever? Cool, you're the side character now, an NPC eating black/red pills and following a script while sitting on a track. Cool story. And is it really shocking that some 10/10 is an evil manipulative whore? Where's the deep message there? I like women for themselves, not a fat slob who doesn't care for herself, sure, but not a checklist either. When I was dating(I do not now) it was a Korean art professor ten years older, beautiful to me, sharp, funny, used to be a tattoo artist, personality that actually clicked. That's a mate. Not a checklist some other guy handed me, not "the standard" according to some rando online. I'm the standard! I make the list! I'm player one in my life. I don't want a robot, a cold distant partner, or someone whose whole personality is makeup and Instagram and K pop. Why would anyone chase that and call it winning? No hate we can disagree all day... But what's really the move at the end of the day beyond "it's over"? Something that that just started rattling in my head as I was punching this up with my thumbs since I'm on my phone... why don't people who buy fully into this ever test it against reality, even at the bottom of the SMV scale? From my perspective for a lot of people the framework isn't really a claim about dating. It's a pre built explanation for why trying is pointless, like I said out of the game before it even starts. It gives them an excuse to be a loser and that it's not there fault it's something outside of there control. I don't think that goes for everything or everyone (not here not you just a generalization) but it surely does for the online intellectual who seems to have got it all figured out doesn't it? so testing it would risk losing the explanation, not just risk another rejection. It's a security blanket, that's harder to give up than a date. [ATTACH type="full"]18959[/ATTACH] [B]TL:DR? ITS A BAD MODEL OF REALITY. ITS JUNK DATA. THE IDEA THAT EVERYONE WHO IS A NORMIE IS WRONG BUT MADE IT WORK AND ONLY THE BIG BRAIN DARK INTELLECTUAL ONLINE MASTERS OF THE RAINBOW OF PILLS ARE RIGHT BUT COULDN'T MAKE IT WORK IS SO COMICAL I CAN'T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY. [ATTACH type="full"]18959[/ATTACH][/B] [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread