Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Patriarchy" data-source="post: 34591" data-attributes="member: 162">So theres the definitionsYour Mohammad, used military might to gain power, You claim he gained power in medina peacefullyYes he was a political success, i think i remember.But he spreads by the sword.Your Mohammad has a trained army? I say that claiming he did not have a trained army&nbsp; is semantical because of on the job experienceTo say that they never had proper training and did not know how to fight after so many armed conflicts is absurdtheir actions are based on self interest not ideology? Well to say they are might be rude, but I will give it my best shotThrough the spoils of war, it is noted that &quot;the spoils of war has been made Halal (lawful) for me&quot;, indicating a clear connection between military success and material rewards.A meme I made[ATTACH=full]5169[/ATTACH]The success of Islam is often attributed more to its political strategies than purely religious motivations, suggesting that material gain played a crucial role in its expansionTheir leadership is tied to charisma and patronage: see my previous answerI dont want to dissect the last qualification he mentions because its waay too deep to discuss IMO. Atleast for a novice like me.Muhammad Hijab is abusing his debate with an empty chair. IMO but thats because i disagree maybeHis explaining how Jesus might not be a figure of peace under some explanation is hilarious but acceptableChristians view wrath is for god and not for man though.He challenges to to find a place in scripture where its says its ok to slay categories of people sheep, cattle, and camel. Now this was really eye opening for me. I have long thought that the muslim treated the kaffir as domestic animals but I did not know that they were divided into animal categories.He forbids killing women and children?God bless, they get to be the slaves of those who bear the true religion in their heartMuhammad Hijab talks about the only time Jesus used violence as an example of a Violent Jesus. Its really funny for him to make this case[MEDIA=youtube]ZwQJLNEkqcE[/MEDIA]Your Muhammad Hijab seems like a terrorist</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Patriarchy, post: 34591, member: 162"] So theres the definitions Your Mohammad, used military might to gain power, You claim he gained power in medina peacefully Yes he was a political success, i think i remember. But he spreads by the sword. Your Mohammad has a trained army? I say that claiming he did not have a trained army is semantical because of on the job experience To say that they never had proper training and did not know how to fight after so many armed conflicts is absurd their actions are based on self interest not ideology? Well to say they are might be rude, but I will give it my best shot Through the spoils of war, it is noted that "the spoils of war has been made Halal (lawful) for me", indicating a clear connection between military success and material rewards. A meme I made [ATTACH type="full" alt="1741804470537.png"]5169[/ATTACH] The success of Islam is often attributed more to its political strategies than purely religious motivations, suggesting that material gain played a crucial role in its expansion Their leadership is tied to charisma and patronage: see my previous answer I dont want to dissect the last qualification he mentions because its waay too deep to discuss IMO. Atleast for a novice like me. Muhammad Hijab is abusing his debate with an empty chair. IMO but thats because i disagree maybe His explaining how Jesus might not be a figure of peace under some explanation is hilarious but acceptable Christians view wrath is for god and not for man though. He challenges to to find a place in scripture where its says its ok to slay categories of people sheep, cattle, and camel. Now this was really eye opening for me. I have long thought that the muslim treated the kaffir as domestic animals but I did not know that they were divided into animal categories. He forbids killing women and children? God bless, they get to be the slaves of those who bear the true religion in their heart Muhammad Hijab talks about the only time Jesus used violence as an example of a Violent Jesus. Its really funny for him to make this case [MEDIA=youtube]ZwQJLNEkqcE[/MEDIA] Your Muhammad Hijab seems like a terrorist [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread