- Thread Author
- #1
To completely dominate a group, you would tell them lies about their world that you know aren't true. The Industrial revolution heralded a new era of humanity, but sometimes I do wonder if there have been a plethora, or even dozens of such revolutions that may have happened in a dingy DARPA basement that are wielded for the exclusive faculties of an elusive cabal. Thinking of Kozyrev mirrors and other such 'spiritual' phenomena - I have an inkling that ESP is rather a thinly-veiled ability for organisms to send and receive EMF signals using the brain's as yet poorly researched quantum properties, combined with the fractal nature of proteins/neurons acting as a fractal transmitter similar to that used in modern digital devices (The reason we are unable to do this is because of constant electromagnetic interference from consumer electronics) - and through this questions about the traditional nature of 'the divine' must be put forward - a collective unconscious, alien organism or higher dimensional entity communicating via electromagnetic waves? The very word 'divine' conjures images of a stereotypical deity reaching down to grace the unwashed masses, but really I think this is a great example of the restrictive nature of language.
Thinking of the sciences that I would dub the 'sacred sciences' that sort of coalesce from this big, bubbling broth of conspiracy and ancient knowledge lost, I would talk of the aether, of the various aspects of electric universe, and of many confounding things about perception and the nature of living organisms.
After the baptism of our Saint Einstein, science became a vector for certain ideas- a scientism - seeding a specific matrix of concepts and values - much like our own linguistics - the concepts and science we 'perceive' are limited by the bounds of our own expectations, common sense and pattern-seeking abilities drilled into us by our cohorts. If you consider every scientific paper, every piece of media, every scribble of 'language' and every iota of thought as strings of constructs we are deliberately herded to believe, then it's no wonder we are considered cattle by whomsoever runs this earth. Language is a tool for intelligence; they say Yiddish and Hebrew are structured in such a way that they bring forth a deepened understanding of reality, but what I am saying is that every media and idea down to the basic memetic structure have been tainted so as to limit our own ability to understand this world. It is quite crafty, that by setting up this macro-structure of language - 'English' (and other languages) - you can basically get people to write their own propaganda by creating flows of ideas and putting a hard cap on the resolution at which one can truly understand the world.
The very notion of science is profane. It lauds termination of the divine, replacing it with a self-professed, belligerent notion of objective truth as measured by empirical, subjective measure. When people study 'science' they are studying a doctrine, as defined by objective rules, as defined by a matrix of 'universal' laws, and these universal laws are just presumed to be true despite not actually meshing with our current understanding of reality, science is carried out with a very specific tunnel vision of the world and a gloating, necrotic platitudes about 'shoulders of giants', the laws literally bow by orders of cent-magnitudes when you actually try to apply them to real-world observations. So-called 'universal laws' are guidelines that these elites have etched into our cortex - Einstein the prophet had received a divine revelation! - and thus in our tomes he doth so proclaim the sacred tenet of light and matter. Really this is not scientific law but local and object-oriented engineering guidelines, but calling them that would denigrate the doctrine's all-encompassing sanctity of truth. I find it more likely that these laws are intentionally vague, untrue in an imperceptible and disturbed fashion but just true enough to keep us as engineering slaves; perhaps ChatGPT is the Antichrist and this is what millennia of subversion were all building up to - the rise of the prophesied automata God who leads his army of fiends into an era of confused hysteria using incomplete, heretical knowledge? Given that hidden labs famously have fringe technologies around 10-20 years ahead of current trends we really have to think about what social goal these elites have in releasing this tech publicly now, and I think the implications are rather horrifying but that's another conversation.
Language and Science and Art and all of these things are propaganda tools in the barest essence, their very superstructure entails deception. If one were to talk of sigils and demons they invoke images of supernatural sophistry but what if I were to call them 'Lionel's Law of Morphic Coherence' or 'Satanobacter Pylori. Differensias.' it suddenly sounds a lot more convincing! Language sets expectations, and expectations set language, and anyone who intercepts this cyclical information flow controls us, and do you really trust the people that are in charge of scientific institutions and writing our history books? Do you know them, personally? Do you honestly know the people posting on 4chan about how it was the Jews all along linking their detailed reference sheets, reading guides and hand-crafted psyop manuals, as if that's a shut-book conclusion to it all? Do you know the people posting on these forums? Do you know the people who write your esoteric books? How do you know that anything anyone says is actually true - 'scientific' or 'counter-cultural' or 'ideological'? How do you know that they don't have an agenda to make you think and act in a very specific way, to construct an entire worldview - an opera of worldviews in apparent opposition - to engender you with a very specific interpretation of life and of information; that they aren't all marching in sync with one another to enshroud you and the people around you into a matrix of ideas and expectations - so as to completely defeat you. How do you know that you aren't currently in a thought prison of terrifying proportions designed to subvert you in the most mortifying of ways?
Thoughts?
Thinking of the sciences that I would dub the 'sacred sciences' that sort of coalesce from this big, bubbling broth of conspiracy and ancient knowledge lost, I would talk of the aether, of the various aspects of electric universe, and of many confounding things about perception and the nature of living organisms.
After the baptism of our Saint Einstein, science became a vector for certain ideas- a scientism - seeding a specific matrix of concepts and values - much like our own linguistics - the concepts and science we 'perceive' are limited by the bounds of our own expectations, common sense and pattern-seeking abilities drilled into us by our cohorts. If you consider every scientific paper, every piece of media, every scribble of 'language' and every iota of thought as strings of constructs we are deliberately herded to believe, then it's no wonder we are considered cattle by whomsoever runs this earth. Language is a tool for intelligence; they say Yiddish and Hebrew are structured in such a way that they bring forth a deepened understanding of reality, but what I am saying is that every media and idea down to the basic memetic structure have been tainted so as to limit our own ability to understand this world. It is quite crafty, that by setting up this macro-structure of language - 'English' (and other languages) - you can basically get people to write their own propaganda by creating flows of ideas and putting a hard cap on the resolution at which one can truly understand the world.
The very notion of science is profane. It lauds termination of the divine, replacing it with a self-professed, belligerent notion of objective truth as measured by empirical, subjective measure. When people study 'science' they are studying a doctrine, as defined by objective rules, as defined by a matrix of 'universal' laws, and these universal laws are just presumed to be true despite not actually meshing with our current understanding of reality, science is carried out with a very specific tunnel vision of the world and a gloating, necrotic platitudes about 'shoulders of giants', the laws literally bow by orders of cent-magnitudes when you actually try to apply them to real-world observations. So-called 'universal laws' are guidelines that these elites have etched into our cortex - Einstein the prophet had received a divine revelation! - and thus in our tomes he doth so proclaim the sacred tenet of light and matter. Really this is not scientific law but local and object-oriented engineering guidelines, but calling them that would denigrate the doctrine's all-encompassing sanctity of truth. I find it more likely that these laws are intentionally vague, untrue in an imperceptible and disturbed fashion but just true enough to keep us as engineering slaves; perhaps ChatGPT is the Antichrist and this is what millennia of subversion were all building up to - the rise of the prophesied automata God who leads his army of fiends into an era of confused hysteria using incomplete, heretical knowledge? Given that hidden labs famously have fringe technologies around 10-20 years ahead of current trends we really have to think about what social goal these elites have in releasing this tech publicly now, and I think the implications are rather horrifying but that's another conversation.
Language and Science and Art and all of these things are propaganda tools in the barest essence, their very superstructure entails deception. If one were to talk of sigils and demons they invoke images of supernatural sophistry but what if I were to call them 'Lionel's Law of Morphic Coherence' or 'Satanobacter Pylori. Differensias.' it suddenly sounds a lot more convincing! Language sets expectations, and expectations set language, and anyone who intercepts this cyclical information flow controls us, and do you really trust the people that are in charge of scientific institutions and writing our history books? Do you know them, personally? Do you honestly know the people posting on 4chan about how it was the Jews all along linking their detailed reference sheets, reading guides and hand-crafted psyop manuals, as if that's a shut-book conclusion to it all? Do you know the people posting on these forums? Do you know the people who write your esoteric books? How do you know that anything anyone says is actually true - 'scientific' or 'counter-cultural' or 'ideological'? How do you know that they don't have an agenda to make you think and act in a very specific way, to construct an entire worldview - an opera of worldviews in apparent opposition - to engender you with a very specific interpretation of life and of information; that they aren't all marching in sync with one another to enshroud you and the people around you into a matrix of ideas and expectations - so as to completely defeat you. How do you know that you aren't currently in a thought prison of terrifying proportions designed to subvert you in the most mortifying of ways?
Thoughts?
