- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Messages
- 1,468
- Thread Author
- #1
Feminism has been labeled "diet coke socialism". Its mostly the role of the culturewar villain in public speeches. What feminism does is maintaining the social order exactly what it was before, bamboozling people making them pretend everything changes.
The grift presents a narrative, everyone heard it someplace: Feminism is a movement that corrupts women and emasculates men, and erases tradcuck values.
Obviously this generates billions in profit if you consider the attention economy alone. So everyone has an interest in doing nothing. And in the history of manuresphere, the incentives led people to simply manifest outrage to preserve the money flow, live the privileged NEET-tuber lifestyle and do nothing.
If you fix feminism, first who loses job is the avg manuresphere grifter, and you can do 2+2 = they have an interest in keeping feminism alive forever.
Rightwing organizations fund and give visibility to women to argue against womanrights, promoting a false alternative. People like Candace Owens for example, this controls the dissent, manufacturing an "alternative" that essentially converges on the default position anyway.
Some people say right wingers are copying language, I think is partially true. The reason they say it is they talk about empowerment and foid liberation. In reality this is one of the natural right wing tendencies, acknowledged by most erudite SJWs.
Erudite SJWs know the secret weapon of conservatism is women. The few who acknowledge the reality that women supported hitler and in UK they shamed men on mass scale to join wars, tend to reframe it because they have a need to appeal to women.
So the conservative position does not have to copy language from their adversary, but it does so. The coopt and reframe of the leftist language isnt necessary, its just optional.
In the 21st century, the vast majority of families cannot survive on a single income. By backing economic policies that keep wages stagnant and eliminate social safety nets (like subsidized childcare or paid family leave), rightwing policies actively ensure that women must work.
The work for women is managerial. Because women are good at it. Managerial roles are things for unthinking apes who follow orders. Try to learn an MBA on the internet, they teach you mostly philosophy, life coaching, wisdom literature, entrepreneur stories, motivational speeches. In other words they teach you "how to think correctly", they dont teach you a skill or a science.
Rightwing grifters point at the boogeyman: Look what feminism did to your family. They forced women into the workplace and ruined your home life! But this is just the tip of the iceberg, if I wanted I could make this thread kilometers long by simply listing all the details of the grift.
Feminism is also compatible with "patriarchy". For example, if you are a rich journalist, you dont have to pay dowry to marry your daughter because she appreciates in value if you position her inside an administrator. Any patriarch can step inside the institution by just placing his daughter in it.
In my country (italy) feminism does this: woman wins 10 seats thanks to quotas in public administrations, 9 of them go to men after the woman renounces them. Feminist masonry uses the concept of "safe space". Translate it like this: segregation of sexes, women go in an area men in another area. If I as an incel say "women should be segregated", people laugh at me. If instead I say "women deserve a safe space" im essentially saying the same thing, but now im a hero for society.
This and other reasons made me unpopular inside incel scene, they just dont see how based I am. They think im a traitor who supports women, but they just dont see reality.
The grift presents a narrative, everyone heard it someplace: Feminism is a movement that corrupts women and emasculates men, and erases tradcuck values.
Obviously this generates billions in profit if you consider the attention economy alone. So everyone has an interest in doing nothing. And in the history of manuresphere, the incentives led people to simply manifest outrage to preserve the money flow, live the privileged NEET-tuber lifestyle and do nothing.
If you fix feminism, first who loses job is the avg manuresphere grifter, and you can do 2+2 = they have an interest in keeping feminism alive forever.
Rightwing organizations fund and give visibility to women to argue against womanrights, promoting a false alternative. People like Candace Owens for example, this controls the dissent, manufacturing an "alternative" that essentially converges on the default position anyway.
Some people say right wingers are copying language, I think is partially true. The reason they say it is they talk about empowerment and foid liberation. In reality this is one of the natural right wing tendencies, acknowledged by most erudite SJWs.
Erudite SJWs know the secret weapon of conservatism is women. The few who acknowledge the reality that women supported hitler and in UK they shamed men on mass scale to join wars, tend to reframe it because they have a need to appeal to women.
So the conservative position does not have to copy language from their adversary, but it does so. The coopt and reframe of the leftist language isnt necessary, its just optional.
In the 21st century, the vast majority of families cannot survive on a single income. By backing economic policies that keep wages stagnant and eliminate social safety nets (like subsidized childcare or paid family leave), rightwing policies actively ensure that women must work.
The work for women is managerial. Because women are good at it. Managerial roles are things for unthinking apes who follow orders. Try to learn an MBA on the internet, they teach you mostly philosophy, life coaching, wisdom literature, entrepreneur stories, motivational speeches. In other words they teach you "how to think correctly", they dont teach you a skill or a science.
Rightwing grifters point at the boogeyman: Look what feminism did to your family. They forced women into the workplace and ruined your home life! But this is just the tip of the iceberg, if I wanted I could make this thread kilometers long by simply listing all the details of the grift.
Feminism is also compatible with "patriarchy". For example, if you are a rich journalist, you dont have to pay dowry to marry your daughter because she appreciates in value if you position her inside an administrator. Any patriarch can step inside the institution by just placing his daughter in it.
In my country (italy) feminism does this: woman wins 10 seats thanks to quotas in public administrations, 9 of them go to men after the woman renounces them. Feminist masonry uses the concept of "safe space". Translate it like this: segregation of sexes, women go in an area men in another area. If I as an incel say "women should be segregated", people laugh at me. If instead I say "women deserve a safe space" im essentially saying the same thing, but now im a hero for society.
This and other reasons made me unpopular inside incel scene, they just dont see how based I am. They think im a traitor who supports women, but they just dont see reality.
