Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
Is good necessary for evil, or are they independent?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 65662" data-attributes="member: 544"><p>honestly, are you even asking this with a straight face? you’re basically trying to measure temperature without a thermometer. saying eden was "good" before the fruit is a total paradox because if "evil" doesn't exist yet, "good" isn't a concept—it's just the default setting.</p><p>it’s like trying to describe "up" if "down" never existed; you'd just be floating in a void with no words for direction. or like math before we discovered the number 0—without parameters, nodes, or data points to compare things to, the whole conversation is basically pointless.</p><p>even jung would tell you that light only becomes visible when it hits an object and creates a shadow. you can’t plot a graph with only one dot, and you can't call something "hot" if "cold" isn't even a possibility yet. you’re just using a post-fruit brain to project a measurement onto a state that had no scales to begin with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 65662, member: 544"] honestly, are you even asking this with a straight face? you’re basically trying to measure temperature without a thermometer. saying eden was "good" before the fruit is a total paradox because if "evil" doesn't exist yet, "good" isn't a concept—it's just the default setting. it’s like trying to describe "up" if "down" never existed; you'd just be floating in a void with no words for direction. or like math before we discovered the number 0—without parameters, nodes, or data points to compare things to, the whole conversation is basically pointless. even jung would tell you that light only becomes visible when it hits an object and creates a shadow. you can’t plot a graph with only one dot, and you can't call something "hot" if "cold" isn't even a possibility yet. you’re just using a post-fruit brain to project a measurement onto a state that had no scales to begin with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
Is good necessary for evil, or are they independent?
Top