Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wolfstorm" data-source="post: 87105" data-attributes="member: 612">The same I said about Mishima also applies to Evola. Evola wasn&#039;t married, but had regular tantric sex with a mistress. He wrote a book about tantra and one about sexuality. He was also part of the UR group, a society of intellectuals from which Arturo Reghini was also part of. At that time, uranism was associated with homosexuality, so Evola could possibly have been bissexual as well, like Mishima was. In fact, solar aesthetics implies in a worship of the male form, which eventually leads to gym culture and homosexuality.Evola made a distinction between the dry path and the wet path, the first being of the solar warrior, and the second of the lunar, hedonistic worshipper of the female form (which, in this context, is not to be confused with simp culture). I always had this contrast between Evola and Nietzsche, as solar (dry/apolinian) and lunar (wet/dionisian) oppositions inside the same worldview. It is funny to see them wrapped together and associated with inceldom, it just reinforces the conclusion that inceldom has nothing to do with celibacy, but just with being a caucasian male, in an era dominated by feminism, pornography and dating culture.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wolfstorm, post: 87105, member: 612"] The same I said about Mishima also applies to Evola. Evola wasn't married, but had regular tantric sex with a mistress. He wrote a book about tantra and one about sexuality. He was also part of the UR group, a society of intellectuals from which Arturo Reghini was also part of. At that time, uranism was associated with homosexuality, so Evola could possibly have been bissexual as well, like Mishima was. In fact, solar aesthetics implies in a worship of the male form, which eventually leads to gym culture and homosexuality. Evola made a distinction between the dry path and the wet path, the first being of the solar warrior, and the second of the lunar, hedonistic worshipper of the female form (which, in this context, is not to be confused with simp culture). I always had this contrast between Evola and Nietzsche, as solar (dry/apolinian) and lunar (wet/dionisian) oppositions inside the same worldview. It is funny to see them wrapped together and associated with inceldom, it just reinforces the conclusion that inceldom has nothing to do with celibacy, but just with being a caucasian male, in an era dominated by feminism, pornography and dating culture. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread