Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 69942" data-attributes="member: 544">I love Nietzsche for the soul, but he was never the best authority on women. Personally I&#039;m split between Schopenhauer and Jung. It sounds like a contradiction but they’re both right, there is no unified theory for human nature. You have to see both the gritty, biological mechanics and the deep, archetypal essence to find the middle ground.No man needs a woman to be complete—you are the main character of your own story. But interacting with the feminine is a catalyst, it can forge you into a whole different being, for better or worse.If you treat it like a chemical reaction, you’ll just get a lab result. If you treat it like a 4D puzzle, you might actually get a non-euclidean result that current stats can’t explain. But I understand that can be hard when you have been let down more then a few times. Just trying to be constructive, much love.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 69942, member: 544"] I love Nietzsche for the soul, but he was never the best authority on women. Personally I'm split between Schopenhauer and Jung. It sounds like a contradiction but they’re both right, there is no unified theory for human nature. You have to see both the gritty, biological mechanics and the deep, archetypal essence to find the middle ground. No man needs a woman to be complete—you are the main character of your own story. But interacting with the feminine is a catalyst, it can forge you into a whole different being, for better or worse. If you treat it like a chemical reaction, you’ll just get a lab result. If you treat it like a 4D puzzle, you might actually get a non-euclidean result that current stats can’t explain. But I understand that can be hard when you have been let down more then a few times. Just trying to be constructive, much love. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread