Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fatcel_3000" data-source="post: 27390" data-attributes="member: 73">It&#039;s difficult to give specific recommendations without a specific subject of interest. There&#039;s a lot here I glazed over. Space Opera, Reincarnation, Demons, Atlantis, and so on. There&#039;s nuance to it but all these subjects have a more factual and scientific basis than most of the the &quot;soft sciences&quot; - Freud&#039;s bizarre sexual fantasies, for one.Hubbard considers his work as a research line rather than a series of textbooks. This means that a book like Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health isn&#039;t what Hubbard thinks, only what he thought at the time of publication, 1950. How most researchers throughout history published their work. The advantage of this is that you learn in an organic way that resembles how he made his discoveries. If he, or anyone with advanced subject matter knowledge laid out everything they knew on the table from the get-go, you&#039;d be in over your head. DMSMH has a lot dedicated to what are called &quot;prenatals&quot;. Memories from before birth. It&#039;s true that anyone can regress to these, sometimes even being a sperm. But his belief that these incidents needed to be re-expierenced because they were &quot;basic-basic&quot; or the original traumatic memory was rescinded by 1952. &quot;Basic-Basic&quot; was found to have occurred in past lives and later on, past universes. You have to start by dipping your toes in the kiddie pool, you can&#039;t introduce concepts like those until people are ready for it. Nowadays, unlike in 1950, these are widely held beliefs that people are familiar with. So the progression of the ciriculum should probably be reworked. Rather tricky to navigate nowadays because it was designed to be disseminated in the 20th century, although the information itself is very workable.The Universal Rights of All Beings are paraphrased slightly from the Axioms of Scientology.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fatcel_3000, post: 27390, member: 73"] It's difficult to give specific recommendations without a specific subject of interest. There's a lot here I glazed over. Space Opera, Reincarnation, Demons, Atlantis, and so on. There's nuance to it but all these subjects have a more factual and scientific basis than most of the the "soft sciences" - Freud's bizarre sexual fantasies, for one. Hubbard considers his work as a research line rather than a series of textbooks. This means that a book like [I]Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health [/I]isn't what Hubbard thinks, only what he thought at the time of publication, 1950. How most researchers throughout history published their work. The advantage of this is that you learn in an organic way that resembles how he made his discoveries. If he, or anyone with advanced subject matter knowledge laid out everything they knew on the table from the get-go, you'd be in over your head. DMSMH has a lot dedicated to what are called "prenatals". Memories from before birth. It's true that anyone can regress to these, sometimes even being a sperm. But his belief that these incidents needed to be re-expierenced because they were "basic-basic" or the original traumatic memory was rescinded by 1952. "Basic-Basic" was found to have occurred in past lives and later on, past universes. You have to start by dipping your toes in the kiddie pool, you can't introduce concepts like those until people are ready for it. Nowadays, unlike in 1950, these are widely held beliefs that people are familiar with. So the progression of the ciriculum should probably be reworked. Rather tricky to navigate nowadays because it was designed to be disseminated in the 20th century, although the information itself is very workable. The Universal Rights of All Beings are paraphrased slightly from the Axioms of Scientology. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread