Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
Machiavelli vs Stoicism
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 80260" data-attributes="member: 656"><p>Stoicism is a life coaching philosophy that divides emotions in bad emotion and good emotion. Its all abitrary.</p><p></p><p>I prefer follow contemporary cognitive science and do whatever I want and even if my portrayal of stoicism isnt accurate I dont really care because marcus aurelius is too boring and I dont want to be told what to feel by a life coach. </p><p></p><p>I dont care if I am precise or not or if im missing wisdom, I couldnt finish his book because hes boring and he failed to articulate a case in a coherent manner. Opinion dismissed. </p><p></p><p>Machiavelli instead, I dont know what to say specific except I understand his language its florentine from the 500 it is known to me. I dont find it life coachey, I think is more like his way of describing a system he was close to. So the description can be accurate. His theory is cool and overall comes from observation, and we can all learn something from it. If is accurate I leave it to historians I have no idea, but im thinking yes it can be real.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 80260, member: 656"] Stoicism is a life coaching philosophy that divides emotions in bad emotion and good emotion. Its all abitrary. I prefer follow contemporary cognitive science and do whatever I want and even if my portrayal of stoicism isnt accurate I dont really care because marcus aurelius is too boring and I dont want to be told what to feel by a life coach. I dont care if I am precise or not or if im missing wisdom, I couldnt finish his book because hes boring and he failed to articulate a case in a coherent manner. Opinion dismissed. Machiavelli instead, I dont know what to say specific except I understand his language its florentine from the 500 it is known to me. I dont find it life coachey, I think is more like his way of describing a system he was close to. So the description can be accurate. His theory is cool and overall comes from observation, and we can all learn something from it. If is accurate I leave it to historians I have no idea, but im thinking yes it can be real. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
Machiavelli vs Stoicism
Top
