Spirituality Nature is God

[CorinthianLOX]

The idea baffles me that an omnipotent creator is a benevolent god. This idea is just simply absurd. The mere idea that god loves us and sees us as equals to each other is simply untrue to life, as many of you may know already. This idea that all men are created equal is one of the first sins of humanity. There is no jewish white bearded man in the sky named YHWH watching us and reviewing our actions. Rather God is something else entirely.

It is Nature that sets the course for our lives, the ultimate decider of destiny and determiner of our lives. It is Nature who decides whether you are born to feast or born to suffer a crushing existence. This is what nature wants, to crush subhumanity and let the fittest survive and to ultimately thrive. Ultimately humans have never overcame Nature or subjucated Nature to man's will. Rather the contrary is the truth. Nature wills that only the best in quality thrive, and the rest are just her debris waiting to be dispenced. Thus we come to the conclusion that genes are Mother Nature's coding. Those of better genetic quality are her favourite works of art and bloom like beautiful idyllic flowers and those of a weaker quality were made to be there for the stronger to dominate over. This prosess is quite logical. It ensures that organic life develops into a higher state of being.

Anyone that sees this principle as harsh or cruel is of an inherent weaker and feebler nature and of a narrower mind. He who sees this principle as unfair deserves the mightiest wrath of Mother Nature upon him.

 

[dreamworld]

The idea baffles me that an omnipotent creator is a benevolent god. This idea is just simply absurd. The mere idea that god loves us and sees us as equals to each other is simply untrue to life, as many of you may know already. This idea that all men are created equal is one of the first sins of humanity. There is no jewish white bearded man in the sky named YHWH watching us and reviewing our actions. Rather God is something else entirely.

It is Nature that sets the course for our lives, the ultimate decider of destiny and determiner of our lives. It is Nature who decides whether you are born to feast or born to suffer a crushing existence. This is what nature wants, to crush subhumanity and let the fittest survive and to ultimately thrive. Ultimately humans have never overcame Nature or subjucated Nature to man's will. Rather the contrary is the truth. Nature wills that only the best in quality thrive, and the rest are just her debris waiting to be dispenced. Thus we come to the conclusion that genes are Mother Nature's coding. Those of better genetic quality are her favourite works of art and bloom like beautiful idyllic flowers and those of a weaker quality were made to be there for the stronger to dominate over. This prosess is quite logical. It ensures that organic life develops into a higher state of being.

Anyone that sees this principle as harsh or cruel is of an inherent weaker and feebler nature and of a narrower mind. He who sees this principle as unfair deserves the mightiest wrath of Mother Nature upon him.

You watch goatis one time :

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Earth is an intelligent design made up of elements earth wind Fire and Water

 

[incelkingkong]

niggas put on a greek statue pfp and get all philosophical n shit

 

[Asgard]

Pain and suffering is illusionary. Pain drives most living beings to mindfulness/self-awareness. If this happens to humans, it is obvious other species might experience the very same phenomena. After all, there is more than this third dimension.

Don't take life seriously.

 

[Asgard]

Earth is an intelligent design made up of elements earth wind Fire and Water

In other words, water is wet. But there's more to that logically.

 

[Asgard]

YHWH

It is a mean to interpret things. Yahweh could practically be the synonym of 3D and 4D space (Man, the material world). Autism overdose, TBH (I say autism because you have that black and white thinking which is commong in the autism spectrum, maybe you should get checked yourself and yeah, I am a bit offended deep down; am still working towards complete indifference and unconditional compassion).

Could you understand an OOP programming language if you had mental retardation (or just think about that quote from Terry A. Davis regarding that bird looking at a computer screen)? That is why everything is made through stories and parables, since it appears more familiar to our own brains regardless of those arbitrary properties each individual possess (like IQ), and yes, I'm still talking from an intelligent design perspective. It's not that deep.

 

[Whitespace]

This is what nature wants, to crush subhumanity and let the fittest survive and to ultimately thrive.

You ever hear about the Prisoner's Dilemma? While it is more intuitive that a human being will act in his self-interest to the detriment of others, the best strategy to ensure survival is cooperation.

Even speaking in Darwinist terms, selfishness is defective. The reason humans have survived well is not only because we have opposable thumbs and brains to make tools but also because we have an unparalleled-ly complex system of cooperation. You'd expect places like Arabia or the Arctic to be the places where "every man is for himself", but no; the more hostile the environments, the more cooperative a society is.

It isn't just me, ask Ibn Khaldun; Berber and Arab tribes who lived in the desert were easily able to conquer cities where survival was trivial. Or, for a European example, Medieval Iceland, Yes, that cold, volcanic island in the far north, where voluntary cooperation was woven into society in lieu of a centralized state. Or even Germanic barbarians overcoming the Romans. Or even now in Latin America where communities bind together with guns, creating informal police units to protect themselves from cartels, of which the government is too weak or unwilling to protect them. Applying a shear force on society makes its units closer to one another.

This is not to say at all that individual strength is meaningless, but there's a reason why a lion may often lose when put against a gaggle of skinny, hairy simians with sticks and rocks.

Furthermore, in what manner is life "better" than another? A lion can easily take a human being down. Does that make the lion better? A bunch of humans are intelligent enough to get together and take a lion down. Does this mean that the human is better? I do not discount that survival is only ensured with those who are able to survive, but different traits work differently in different situations.

Why do you think there are different species of bears or different races of humans? Why do you think humans in hotter climates developed melanin to save themselves from the sun's UV rays? It's a concept that I agree with you on, still, but I feel it is substantially more complex than you let on.

If you remove all civilization from humanity and leave man in his most primeval state, all man will do is rebuild civilization. Because civilization and morality IS a part of nature, and IS a part of our survival. Religion isn't created because people are bored and survival is trivial but for the opposite reason: by universalizing and generalizing nature, you're able to make it intuitive and more easily comprehensible.

I do believe in a God beyond all existence, but the entire universe reflects Him. Every choice in nature, from that human drive for cooperation and kindness to a lion's sharp teeth chewing through an antelope's gristle and cartilage, is a reflection of that. He exists within the moral and amoral, every choice is His, including the survival of the fittest.

 

[newsincerity]

Pain and suffering is illusionary.

pain is objective suffering is subjective
both these things are real

Don't take life seriously.

Life is a serious thing
You only have one

 

[Asgard]

pain is objective suffering is subjective
both these things are real

Life is a serious thing
You only have one

Fuck this shit life, I wanna rest for a bit.