- Thread Author
- #1
1. Patriarchy exists.
2. Intelligence is selected for with the establishment of basic religion, slowly driving up quality of life.
3. Improvements in infrastructure allow proles to have more children and greater social mobility.
4. Society adopts socially liberal and feminist principles as women are intelligent enough to join the workforce and contribute.
5. Women are granted elevated status and are allowed to take managerial jobs, of which they excel due to greater verbal proficiency.
6. Less children are born to the intellectual women who are socially liberal.
7. A baby bust occurs due to women not having as many children, causing demographic inversion.
8. All of the socially liberal, aristocratic and educated women die with no or few kin.
9. All of the low IQ patriarchal males that treat women like property have loads of children.
10. Women who are attracted to low IQ patriarchal males have greater reproductive success and pass on this preference.
11. Society reverts to a patriarchy with dominant males and submissive women with an element of mutual reciprocity. Testosterone-addled males and estrogenic females are strongly reaffirmed in the absence of structural intervention.
Thankfully we are moving past this due to an extraordinary sprint toward Prometheanism.
On the very topical subject of autism: Could it be that women are no longer being selected for feminine traits due to the radical increase in QoL? Therefore women with greater androgenic phenotypes who would previously been catapulted back to submissive femininity through directional selection are now having a good amount of children with unexpected biological consequences (because the entire genetic framework is centered around the Nash equilibrium of women tethered to estrogenic submission, but now women have more androgenic profiles because...):
1. Estrogenic fat storage is no longer required. If you didn't already know, the reason men like large butts is because gluteofemoral fat (a shapely butt) consists of PUFAs that nourish the brain of a growing child. High dietary PUFA intake could annul the requirement for estrogenic fat distribution, and in turn the requirement for estrogen-dominanant genetic stabilization in women. It's suspicious that PUFA intake corresponds with the introduction of autism in humans, and people are eating more PUFAs than ever... removing the need for women to have them in the body to have non-disabled kids!
2. Modern Society rewards ambitious and intelligent women... or at least it did. Prior to the open-plan office spaces of today, in the 20th century offices were neat cubicle arrangements and had an emphasis on functional efficiency. Requirements for socialization were minimal. Social mobility was at its highest. The economy was booming. Contraceptive pills has only just started to be rolled out. There was an increased selection pressure for systematizing women who were good at their job, and they happened to date similarly intellectual males. It's well known that many genes for intelligence tend to correspond with autism. Yet the problem with selecting for intelligent genes is that genetic mutations not selected for in a purifying sense are unwieldy and can have unexpected synergism due to not having associated deleterious effects weeded out.
It's well known in modern genetics that mutational load is increasing a lot in humans, leading to unexpected side effects:
The genetics for such unprecedented intelligence are too recent to have been 'cleaned up' by evolution, so to speak. This results in greater mutational load. Current genetics can be viewed as being upheld via a scaffold of intricate relationships. If new parts are added to the building unexpectedly, it's anyone's guess as to whether some parts of this scaffold collapse. In my opinion this is autism. Autism represents such a radical drop-off in reproductive fitness due to the mutational load associated with (androgenic intelligence) selected traits that any mass androgenic intellectual push in society would've been met with a sharp reversion to the intellectual mean.
Women could simply have more abberant, masked genetic patterns that would've otherwise been purged in a traditional society, with altered selection pressure due to dietary supplementation of PUFAs. If these women with high mutational load are able to give birth thanks to modern medicine and 21st century society, then the rate of mutated children will increase with unusual phenotypes. Women with greater mutational load are possibly more likely to be infected by disease, especially if androgenic and mutagenically unstable phenotypes (like androgen-related IQ, spatial and mathematical intellect) are selected for as testosterone is an immunosuppressant. This would lead to more frequent and intense fevers, and of course, greater use of analgesics such as Tylenol, so here is your causal link.
