Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ishmael" data-source="post: 64146" data-attributes="member: 532">You are absolutely correct about &#039;looksmaxxing&#039; people, one being for vanity. The concept itself is harmful, it just expresses itself through different examples. The idea of Chad and Virgin are holdovers from tribal society and harmful. The main difference between what you say here, identifying with being rich vs being actually rich, is an unfair comparison for someone who wishes to be the opposite sex. You can attain and lose material wealth. You cannot change your gender. You can attain wealth through &#039;legitimate&#039; means, or through sin; but you can only emulate the opposite sex through masquerading and deceit.If I have a ton of money, my identity is simply whatever I make it. The money is an afterthought. However; when sex is involved, a significant number of factors take a backseat or are considered differently and that&#039;s a fact of society. It&#039;s something that I&#039;ve seen repeated across reality, especially in those with low self worth and regurgitated through the consistent internet culture, of which is slowly spreading into the &#039;uniculture&#039; that is being pushed. The toxicity of moral relativity rears its ugly head.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ishmael, post: 64146, member: 532"] You are absolutely correct about 'looksmaxxing' people, one being for vanity. The concept itself is harmful, it just expresses itself through different examples. The idea of Chad and Virgin are holdovers from tribal society and harmful. The main difference between what you say here, identifying with being rich vs being actually rich, is an unfair comparison for someone who wishes to be the opposite sex. You can attain and lose material wealth. You cannot change your gender. You can attain wealth through 'legitimate' means, or through sin; but you can only emulate the opposite sex through masquerading and deceit. If I have a ton of money, my identity is simply whatever I make it. The money is an afterthought. However; when sex is involved, a significant number of factors take a backseat or are considered differently and that's a fact of society. It's something that I've seen repeated across reality, especially in those with low self worth and regurgitated through the consistent internet culture, of which is slowly spreading into the 'uniculture' that is being pushed. The toxicity of moral relativity rears its ugly head. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread