Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 81776" data-attributes="member: 656">The protagonist told sybil &quot;one day I will defeat you&quot; or &quot;someone else will&quot;, with new theory maybe...sybil laughed and told her go ahead and try.I dont think shes right. You can defeat bureaucracy, cause is a formal system. But sybil... its something else, its human brains in a vat a council of intelligences who is biological.The anarchist rebels were also all clueless, unable even to define the enemy they were rebeling against, they didnt even know what is sybil, cause they couldnt model it, its not just &quot;a bureaucracy&quot;.You cannot rebel easily against a thing like sybil, a system that defines what is &quot;correct measurement&quot; is a human that simply says &quot;humans are measure of all things&quot;, its very hard to solve.Also sybil wants you to solve it, so it can grow further.Lastly, notice the protagonist (forgot her asian name) said the solution to sybil is bureaucracy. She said she wanted to go back to institutions that put people on trial and judge them before the law. Isnt it ironic? Cause the framing of the first part of the narrative was Human vs bureaucracy.Later, it is shown that bureaucracy was the alternative to sybil.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 81776, member: 656"] The protagonist told sybil "one day I will defeat you" or "someone else will", with new theory maybe... sybil laughed and told her go ahead and try. I dont think shes right. You can defeat bureaucracy, cause is a formal system. But sybil... its something else, its human brains in a vat a council of intelligences who is biological. The anarchist rebels were also all clueless, unable even to define the enemy they were rebeling against, they didnt even know what is sybil, cause they couldnt model it, its not just "a bureaucracy". You cannot rebel easily against a thing like sybil, a system that defines what is "correct measurement" is a human that simply says "humans are measure of all things", its very hard to solve. Also sybil wants you to solve it, so it can grow further. Lastly, notice the protagonist (forgot her asian name) said the solution to sybil is bureaucracy. She said she wanted to go back to institutions that put people on trial and judge them before the law. Isnt it ironic? Cause the framing of the first part of the narrative was Human vs bureaucracy. Later, it is shown that bureaucracy was the alternative to sybil. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread