- Thread Author
- #1
It has been said that racism is a mental distortion but is it really.
Idealogical or identity beliefs in my theory acts as sort of a belief that gets consulted whenever you do anything. As a result it is more chaotic and complicated to add on all sorts of arbitrary historical or biological beliefs about race etc whenever you make a decision. So in theory a more simpler idea that does not lead to needless genociding or further thinking has been introduced rather the idea that all races and genders are equal. (it is also to increase postmodernist thinking and meritocracy but we will discuss how that is bullshit later) Why did the leaders of the west publish this information, why do they peddle it so much, well it's to increase the working efficiency of the average person. The average person's iq is only 100 they cannot afford to waste precious brain space on such complicated ideas.
So it makes perfect sense to do this, to avoid a mass wave of identity/ ideologically based racist people. As hitler said, the masses cannot be philosophers.
But what if the idea that there are unequal races becomes less ideological and more scientific, what if we also decided to not genocide people and get into ww3 and just organize racism under a scientific field that is just retrieved whenever you want. Well then you have this relatively hard to use idea in your head that certain races should be enslaved/ genocided, certain races are better to hire/ get along with/ learn from/ buy goods from. In effect it only benefits the higher iq people and ones with resources. The people who can afford private education or educate themselves, people who can afford to avoid the ghettos, people in charge of hiring, people who can choose their friends. So again this only harms the lower iq people whose only usage of the information is to get angry and genocide people or murder people. Thus, what has effectively happened is that the fairly accurate scientific racism is hidden from the masses in order to promote peace and working efficiency, it is not actually a correct ideology.
What about all the good certain types of people we go to school with and work with, aren't they good. Well, yes most of them won't kill you but they probably will take advantage of you whenever they can and hope that you don't notice as your wisdom may be lacking, that's precisely what allows the illusion to continue on is the fact that they silently screw people over or do nothing usually.
What about postmodernism and meritocracy. Well, postmodernism firstly might as well be schizophrenia. It is a form of thinking that heightens creativity at the expense of extreme paranoia and probably inefficiency in a lot of ways. Modernism at its height is probably superior. Postmodernism thought spawned from a racial trauma or depression in a society that doesn't tell the truth might perhaps occur and this would possibly cause schizophrenic thinking and lower the general working ability of those involved but heightens their creativity. So on average people are less efficient and more creative. There's really no need to have this increase in schizophrenia when it effectively cancels out the benefits on its own. After that, the average person is actually just the same in general creativity except they don't have the racial or feminist element in their creativity, does this boost creativity? Well considering the low amount of neurons to store this information I wouldn't say so.
What about meritocracy, getting more women and minorities into positions of power. Well, obviously the people with higher iq probably will not like these types of people so you need to introduce forced hiring. But, is this really worth it. What is the point of decreasing the iq of the nation over several centuries on average just to fix racism. It makes no sense from an economic perspective. It would make more sense to actually just allow the current system to continue and allow the very smartest minorities to survive because they truly have higher than average iqs. it makes no sense to effectively fund a lower iq subgroup on average totally to equalize them. And on the feminist side, destroying the patriarchy to fix the power structures might be a solution to various problems. Who knows. But, it's not exactly coming for free. As a result of feminism the birth rate has plumetted, a lot of men are depressed being separated from their natural motivations and reassurances, there's a war against them. A meritocracy for women might be nice it could introduce more competitive products, better governance, but is it really possible when men have to suffer in exchange. That seems to be organizing a female dominated society in effect. It probably won't end very well.
Idealogical or identity beliefs in my theory acts as sort of a belief that gets consulted whenever you do anything. As a result it is more chaotic and complicated to add on all sorts of arbitrary historical or biological beliefs about race etc whenever you make a decision. So in theory a more simpler idea that does not lead to needless genociding or further thinking has been introduced rather the idea that all races and genders are equal. (it is also to increase postmodernist thinking and meritocracy but we will discuss how that is bullshit later) Why did the leaders of the west publish this information, why do they peddle it so much, well it's to increase the working efficiency of the average person. The average person's iq is only 100 they cannot afford to waste precious brain space on such complicated ideas.
So it makes perfect sense to do this, to avoid a mass wave of identity/ ideologically based racist people. As hitler said, the masses cannot be philosophers.
But what if the idea that there are unequal races becomes less ideological and more scientific, what if we also decided to not genocide people and get into ww3 and just organize racism under a scientific field that is just retrieved whenever you want. Well then you have this relatively hard to use idea in your head that certain races should be enslaved/ genocided, certain races are better to hire/ get along with/ learn from/ buy goods from. In effect it only benefits the higher iq people and ones with resources. The people who can afford private education or educate themselves, people who can afford to avoid the ghettos, people in charge of hiring, people who can choose their friends. So again this only harms the lower iq people whose only usage of the information is to get angry and genocide people or murder people. Thus, what has effectively happened is that the fairly accurate scientific racism is hidden from the masses in order to promote peace and working efficiency, it is not actually a correct ideology.
What about all the good certain types of people we go to school with and work with, aren't they good. Well, yes most of them won't kill you but they probably will take advantage of you whenever they can and hope that you don't notice as your wisdom may be lacking, that's precisely what allows the illusion to continue on is the fact that they silently screw people over or do nothing usually.
What about postmodernism and meritocracy. Well, postmodernism firstly might as well be schizophrenia. It is a form of thinking that heightens creativity at the expense of extreme paranoia and probably inefficiency in a lot of ways. Modernism at its height is probably superior. Postmodernism thought spawned from a racial trauma or depression in a society that doesn't tell the truth might perhaps occur and this would possibly cause schizophrenic thinking and lower the general working ability of those involved but heightens their creativity. So on average people are less efficient and more creative. There's really no need to have this increase in schizophrenia when it effectively cancels out the benefits on its own. After that, the average person is actually just the same in general creativity except they don't have the racial or feminist element in their creativity, does this boost creativity? Well considering the low amount of neurons to store this information I wouldn't say so.
What about meritocracy, getting more women and minorities into positions of power. Well, obviously the people with higher iq probably will not like these types of people so you need to introduce forced hiring. But, is this really worth it. What is the point of decreasing the iq of the nation over several centuries on average just to fix racism. It makes no sense from an economic perspective. It would make more sense to actually just allow the current system to continue and allow the very smartest minorities to survive because they truly have higher than average iqs. it makes no sense to effectively fund a lower iq subgroup on average totally to equalize them. And on the feminist side, destroying the patriarchy to fix the power structures might be a solution to various problems. Who knows. But, it's not exactly coming for free. As a result of feminism the birth rate has plumetted, a lot of men are depressed being separated from their natural motivations and reassurances, there's a war against them. A meritocracy for women might be nice it could introduce more competitive products, better governance, but is it really possible when men have to suffer in exchange. That seems to be organizing a female dominated society in effect. It probably won't end very well.
Last edited:
