Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Tartarus
Rule with an iron fist.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 83470" data-attributes="member: 656"><p>I noticed when you rule with an iron fist, the lesser creatures in your society complain less. </p><p></p><p>Feminism is a perfect example. In the past, feminism was confrontational but it was also reasonable up to a point, and there was an open debate going on. </p><p></p><p>People complained and mocked the color of hair of some girl. The various lesser creatures lost in debate vs feminists, they became embittered. </p><p></p><p>Nowadays, feminism is very tyrannical, probably they learned a lesson or 2. And they express their wants and desires in action rather than words. Result: the people dont complain, the plebeians are unable to rationalize the power above them, unless an eceleb grifter gives them a translation in emotional terms, which rarely happens.</p><p></p><p>In other words I think people complained the most when complaint was cheaper. When it was easy, they simply resorted to slander and mockery of andrea dworkins, or other feminists. Even if andrea dworkins had much more IQ than all these conservative commentators combined, they resorted to slander like the inferior life forms often do. </p><p></p><p>But once a movement ideas are represented in universities, corporations, media orgs, governments, debates often become less about convincing opponents, the normies simply adapt, bow their heads, their slanderous lies mutate into cringe expressions of impotence and false analysis done aping some grifter on social media. Debate lowers quality, attracts only idiots who listen to grifters. Dissent isnt cheap anymore, it becomes hard. </p><p></p><p>Also, I suspect that the lesser creature plebeians dont necessarily dislike rule with an ironfist, they simply hate to think, or hate to be indivuals. But if you give them an iron fist rule, whatever that may be, they will move along, they will be happier. Hence why World Economic Forum slogan is "you will own nothing, you will be happy", which is simply true. The plebs will be happier if they own nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 83470, member: 656"] I noticed when you rule with an iron fist, the lesser creatures in your society complain less. Feminism is a perfect example. In the past, feminism was confrontational but it was also reasonable up to a point, and there was an open debate going on. People complained and mocked the color of hair of some girl. The various lesser creatures lost in debate vs feminists, they became embittered. Nowadays, feminism is very tyrannical, probably they learned a lesson or 2. And they express their wants and desires in action rather than words. Result: the people dont complain, the plebeians are unable to rationalize the power above them, unless an eceleb grifter gives them a translation in emotional terms, which rarely happens. In other words I think people complained the most when complaint was cheaper. When it was easy, they simply resorted to slander and mockery of andrea dworkins, or other feminists. Even if andrea dworkins had much more IQ than all these conservative commentators combined, they resorted to slander like the inferior life forms often do. But once a movement ideas are represented in universities, corporations, media orgs, governments, debates often become less about convincing opponents, the normies simply adapt, bow their heads, their slanderous lies mutate into cringe expressions of impotence and false analysis done aping some grifter on social media. Debate lowers quality, attracts only idiots who listen to grifters. Dissent isnt cheap anymore, it becomes hard. Also, I suspect that the lesser creature plebeians dont necessarily dislike rule with an ironfist, they simply hate to think, or hate to be indivuals. But if you give them an iron fist rule, whatever that may be, they will move along, they will be happier. Hence why World Economic Forum slogan is "you will own nothing, you will be happy", which is simply true. The plebs will be happier if they own nothing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Tartarus
Rule with an iron fist.
Top