Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="6ft4" data-source="post: 58267" data-attributes="member: 357">While they recognize the supposed superiority of others in a given field who are no threat to them because the supposed superior ones only have that one trait which they base their identity around, they are in a box which they cannot exceed so they&#039;re allowed to be recognized for that one trait. It doesn&#039;t mean ALL negative/ambiguous feedback is jealousy, projection, or insecurity, I can accept instances of such feedback when it does reflect reality.When retroactively connecting the dots of feedback towards me throughout my life, I noticed the pattern where any positive feedback towards me was withheld in situations where I dominated against normies but was given to others who were seen as no threat or were well established in the hierarchy when they were able to do similar or less than me. I don&#039;t see how what I&#039;m writing has the same obsession with hierarchy.I am only discussing the hierarchy because normies deny judging by merit in order to reserve approval for those who don&#039;t upset the existing hierarchy I didn&#039;t form my thoughts on why people were reacting to me the way they were in real time.I just questioned afterwards how it was such a consistent pattern that normies would actively ignore it when I achieved the most in a field that was objectively measurable, while they&#039;d praise others for their displays of competence in certain fields while not objectively being the best.I didn&#039;t give a fuck about receiving any positive feedback to them, I just couldn&#039;t understand how they could invest so much&nbsp; into verbalizing that x person was amazing in a certain field, when I was getting objectively better outcomes in that field, and my thread explained the reasons why they did this.I don&#039;t see what more I&#039;d need to explain How do those reactions fall into the same narrative about hierarchyI don&#039;t care about whether people praise me or not in isolation, it&#039;s how they refuse to lose gracefully to me and visibly rage or come up with excuses when I beat them, while gushing over someone who&#039;s wins at something when they don&#039;t threaten their pre established feelings of where they are in the pecking order</blockquote>

[QUOTE="6ft4, post: 58267, member: 357"] While they recognize the supposed superiority of others in a given field who are no threat to them because the supposed superior ones only have that one trait which they base their identity around, they are in a box which they cannot exceed so they're allowed to be recognized for that one trait. It doesn't mean ALL negative/ambiguous feedback is jealousy, projection, or insecurity, I can accept instances of such feedback when it does reflect reality. When retroactively connecting the dots of feedback towards me throughout my life, I noticed the pattern where any positive feedback towards me was withheld in situations where I dominated against normies but was given to others who were seen as no threat or were well established in the hierarchy when they were able to do similar or less than me. I don't see how what I'm writing has the same obsession with hierarchy. I am only discussing the hierarchy because normies deny judging by merit in order to reserve approval for those who don't upset the existing hierarchy I didn't form my thoughts on why people were reacting to me the way they were in real time. I just questioned afterwards how it was such a consistent pattern that normies would actively ignore it when I achieved the most in a field that was objectively measurable, while they'd praise others for their displays of competence in certain fields while not objectively being the best. I didn't give a fuck about receiving any positive feedback to them, I just couldn't understand how they could invest so much into verbalizing that x person was amazing in a certain field, when I was getting objectively better outcomes in that field, and my thread explained the reasons why they did this. I don't see what more I'd need to explain How do those reactions fall into the same narrative about hierarchy I don't care about whether people praise me or not in isolation, it's how they refuse to lose gracefully to me and visibly rage or come up with excuses when I beat them, while gushing over someone who's wins at something when they don't threaten their pre established feelings of where they are in the pecking order [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread