Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="deaf_judger" data-source="post: 58269" data-attributes="member: 390">I am not sure about this. Very interesting-&nbsp; Every instance of praise is a function of threat/hierarchy.+ Recognition = no threat+ No recognition = threat- Hmm. I cannot think about this one- No examples were provided in which someone criticized you and were right- You only say its jealousy when you know it is, and hierarchy is only talked about because they do it first- Question: What criteria do you use to decide when feedback reflects reality or comes from jealousy?- You only talk about hierarchy because normies are obsessed with hierarchy- you interpret their behavior as driven by hierarchy default- The obsession is that the only possible explanation you consider for their behavior is “defending hierarchy.”- You are still reading social behavior as a hierarchy-threat model- Praise = &quot;honesty&quot;This only works if your default assumption is that you are at the top and praise is acknowledging your place- no praise = threatenedA lack of praise is not disinterest, or different preferences. It can only mean hierarchy protection- ghosting = insecurityGhosting can&nbsp; be random, disinterest, ... anything really. You immediately place it into the hierarchy narrarative: she fears being below you- friend neutral reaction = protecting hierarchyNeutrality is still interpreted as a threat response, it could be boredom, apathy, or anything else. It is interpreted as defense of his place in the social pecking order- You interpret every income as proof you threaten their position- uneven praise is evidence of a hierarchy- [I think] that praise can come inconsistently for many reasons: friendship,&nbsp; randomness, ... You only allow one explanation- Still assuming your win threatens them- their reaction must be insecurity- praise of others is to preserve status- excuses = coping, and their anger comes from inability to accept your superiorityThe core narrarative is the same: they are reacting to you because you are superior and they are defending their position</blockquote>

[QUOTE="deaf_judger, post: 58269, member: 390"] I am not sure about this. Very interesting - Every instance of praise is a function of threat/hierarchy. + Recognition = no threat + No recognition = threat - Hmm. I cannot think about this one - No examples were provided in which someone criticized you and were right - You only say its jealousy when you know it is, and hierarchy is only talked about because they do it first - Question: What criteria do you use to decide when feedback reflects reality or comes from jealousy? - You only talk about hierarchy because normies are obsessed with hierarchy - you interpret their behavior as driven by hierarchy default - The obsession is that the only possible explanation you consider for their behavior is “defending hierarchy.” - You are still reading social behavior as a hierarchy-threat model - Praise = "honesty" This only works if your default assumption is that you are at the top and praise is acknowledging your place - no praise = threatened A lack of praise is not disinterest, or different preferences. It can only mean hierarchy protection - ghosting = insecurity Ghosting can be random, disinterest, ... anything really. You immediately place it into the hierarchy narrarative: she fears being below you - friend neutral reaction = protecting hierarchy Neutrality is still interpreted as a threat response, it could be boredom, apathy, or anything else. It is interpreted as defense of his place in the social pecking order - You interpret every income as proof you threaten their position - uneven praise is evidence of a hierarchy - [I think] that praise can come inconsistently for many reasons: friendship, randomness, ... You only allow one explanation - Still assuming your win threatens them - their reaction must be insecurity - praise of others is to preserve status - excuses = coping, and their anger comes from inability to accept your superiority The core narrarative is the same: they are reacting to you because you are superior and they are defending their position [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread