Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 84484" data-attributes="member: 656">I think failed normies are people defined by failure, &quot;lack of&quot;, and they are broadly speaking just average normies. The phenomenon of failed normies in my opinion is an inevitable conclusion derived from our society and the values of the majority. Values in society currently are equality, fairness, the talk about &quot;colonialism&quot; (seen as a bad thing), &quot;patriarchy&quot;, so on. The normies who espouse these wrong values failed to adapt during the times where values were universal, egalitarianism ethics rule above our heads and everyone talks bout &quot;unfairness&quot; an &quot;privilege&quot;. Personally, I am against equality and fairness and compassion. I am against &quot;having a role&quot; and &quot;performativity&quot;. In other words Im against normie life. So for this reason I reject your definitions. I reject all your premises and your conclusions. I dont acknowledge the jargon you use &quot;truecel&quot; doesnt mean squat to me. All your values are wrong, your ideas are all wrong. Determining beliefs of someone based on his aesthetic level is wrong. the correct conclusion is mine. The issue is society, its this belief in equality and fairness. It can only lead to &quot;failed normies&quot; because equality contradicts itself. Its by design, there can not be &quot;equality&quot;, not in this material reality. which is why many of these failed normies get into &quot;spirituality&quot;, they want to cope put their heads down the sand. But even if im not expert in &quot;spiritual&quot; stuff, I already noticed there is inequality even in that field. And spirituality does not belongs to all, its again based on achievement and it differentiates people.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 84484, member: 656"] I think failed normies are people defined by failure, "lack of", and they are broadly speaking just average normies. The phenomenon of failed normies in my opinion is an inevitable conclusion derived from our society and the values of the majority. Values in society currently are equality, fairness, the talk about "colonialism" (seen as a bad thing), "patriarchy", so on. The normies who espouse these wrong values failed to adapt during the times where values were universal, egalitarianism ethics rule above our heads and everyone talks bout "unfairness" an "privilege". Personally, I am against equality and fairness and compassion. I am against "having a role" and "performativity". In other words Im against normie life. So for this reason I reject your definitions. I reject all your premises and your conclusions. I dont acknowledge the jargon you use "truecel" doesnt mean squat to me. All your values are wrong, your ideas are all wrong. Determining beliefs of someone based on his aesthetic level is wrong. the correct conclusion is mine. The issue is society, its this belief in equality and fairness. It can only lead to "failed normies" because equality contradicts itself. Its by design, there can not be "equality", not in this material reality. which is why many of these failed normies get into "spirituality", they want to cope put their heads down the sand. But even if im not expert in "spiritual" stuff, I already noticed there is inequality even in that field. And spirituality does not belongs to all, its again based on achievement and it differentiates people. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread