Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Naofumi" data-source="post: 47430" data-attributes="member: 39">them; just one or two percent would have sufficed, to subvert theirpernicious aims. But this seems to be his last such reference, in anydocumented writing or speech. In a sense, this exception proves the rule:If Hitler had wanted to speak of killing the Jews, he surely would have.Since we find no such talk after 1925-even during the war-we mustassume that he in fact never intended their deaths.The two most contentious words that Hitler used regarding the Jewswere ausrotten and vernichten. English sources always translate these asintent to &quot;exterminate,&quot; &quot;destroy,&quot; or &quot;annihilate&quot; the Jews; but this isanother deception. None of his actual words demands mass killing-oreven any killing at all. If the Jews have been driven out of Germany, theyhave indeed been &#039;exterminated&#039; (lit. &#039;driven beyond the border&#039;). If theircontrol over the economy has been terminated, their power has indeed been&#039;annihilated,&#039; or &#039;brought to nothing.&#039; If Jewish society has been removed,it may rightly be said to have been &#039;destroyed&#039; (lit. &#039;un-built&#039; or&#039;deconstructed&#039;). Hitler&#039;s tough talk was never any different than that ofany world leader when confronting a mortal enemy. President Obama oftenspoke of &quot;destroying&quot; the &quot;cancer&quot; of the Islamic State, but no one accusedhim of attempted genocide.Thus, we find no talk of mass murder, extermination camps, genocide,or anything like this in Mein Kampf Hitler&#039;s opponents search in vain forsigns of an impending &#039;Holocaust. &#039; The reader is invited to do the same. Itis simply not there-much to the chagrin of his critics.From all this, it should be clear that Hitler had only one real enemy inthe Jews. He was not some all-purpose hater of humanity. He disliked theFrench, respected the British and Americans, and sympathized with theRussians, but didn&#039;t hate them. Even the lesser races were never a target ofcontempt, but rather, if anything, pity. Today we are under the impressionthat, in 1940, the entire world quivered at the thought of a Nazi takeover.But this was never more than trumped-up propaganda.In short, unless you were a Jew, you had nothing to fear. Whites had nothingto fear-unless they allowed themselves to be ruled by Jewish Marxists orJewish capitalists. Hispanics, Blacks, and Orientals, though of lower status,had nothing to fear. France and England had nothing to fear-until theydeclared war on Germany. America never had anything to fear-untilRoosevelt and his Jewish advisors made the unwise decision to harass Germanyand Japan into conflict. It was always and only the Jews who were his enemy.From the Jewish perspective, of course, this is the ultimate evil: a manwho seeks to destroy Jewish power, confiscate their obscene wealth, and</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Naofumi, post: 47430, member: 39"] them; just one or two percent would have sufficed, to subvert their pernicious aims. But this seems to be his last such reference, in any documented writing or speech. In a sense, this exception proves the rule: If Hitler had wanted to speak of killing the Jews, he surely would have. Since we find no such talk after 1925-even during the war-we must assume that he in fact never intended their deaths. The two most contentious words that Hitler used regarding the Jews were ausrotten and vernichten. English sources always translate these as intent to "exterminate," "destroy," or "annihilate" the Jews; but this is another deception. None of his actual words demands mass killing-or even any killing at all. If the Jews have been driven out of Germany, they have indeed been 'exterminated' (lit. 'driven beyond the border'). If their control over the economy has been terminated, their power has indeed been 'annihilated,' or 'brought to nothing.' If Jewish society has been removed, it may rightly be said to have been 'destroyed' (lit. 'un-built' or 'deconstructed'). Hitler's tough talk was never any different than that of any world leader when confronting a mortal enemy. President Obama often spoke of "destroying" the "cancer" of the Islamic State, but no one accused him of attempted genocide. Thus, we find no talk of mass murder, extermination camps, genocide, or anything like this in Mein Kampf Hitler's opponents search in vain for signs of an impending 'Holocaust. ' The reader is invited to do the same. It is simply not there-much to the chagrin of his critics. From all this, it should be clear that Hitler had only one real enemy in the Jews. He was not some all-purpose hater of humanity. He disliked the French, respected the British and Americans, and sympathized with the Russians, but didn't hate them. Even the lesser races were never a target of contempt, but rather, if anything, pity. Today we are under the impression that, in 1940, the entire world quivered at the thought of a Nazi takeover. But this was never more than trumped-up propaganda. In short, unless you were a Jew, you had nothing to fear. Whites had nothing to fear-unless they allowed themselves to be ruled by Jewish Marxists or Jewish capitalists. Hispanics, Blacks, and Orientals, though of lower status, had nothing to fear. France and England had nothing to fear-until they declared war on Germany. America never had anything to fear-until Roosevelt and his Jewish advisors made the unwise decision to harass Germany and Japan into conflict. It was always and only the Jews who were his enemy. From the Jewish perspective, of course, this is the ultimate evil: a man who seeks to destroy Jewish power, confiscate their obscene wealth, and [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread