Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Naofumi" data-source="post: 47452" data-attributes="member: 39"><p>I went away full of disgust. But at the same time, I was so deeply</p><p>affected that it was quite impossible for me to ignore the whole situation</p><p>and to stop thinking about it. When my anger began to calm down, my</p><p>spirit of obstinacy got the upper hand and I decided that I would get back</p><p>to work again in the building trade, at all costs. This decision became all</p><p>the stronger a few weeks later, when my meager savings ran out and hunger</p><p>clutched me once again in its merciless arms. I had no alternative. I got</p><p>work again, but I soon had to leave for the same reasons as before.</p><p>Then I asked myself: Are these men worthy of belonging to a great people?</p><p>The question was profoundly disturbing. If the answer was 'Yes,' then the</p><p>struggle to defend one's nationality is hardly worth all the pain and sacrifice</p><p>we demand of our best men, if it only be in the interests of such rabble. On the</p><p>other hand, if the answer was 'No,' then we are a nation of pitiful men.</p><p>During those days of mental anguish and deep reflection, I envisioned</p><p>an ever-increasing mass of people who could no longer be reckoned as</p><p>belonging to their own nation.</p><p>2.14 THE SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC PRESS</p><p>It was quite a different feeling a few days later, when I gazed at the</p><p>endless columns, four abreast, of Viennese workmen parading at a mass</p><p>demonstration! I stood dumbfounded for almost two hours, watching that</p><p>enormous human dragon slowly uncoil itself in front of me. When I finally</p><p>left the square and wandered home, I felt dismayed and depressed.</p><p>On my way, I noticed the Arbeiter-Zeitung (The Worker's Journal) in a</p><p>tobacco shop. This was the chief press-organ of the old Austrian Social</p><p>Democracy. It was also available in a cheap cafe that I used to visit, and</p><p>where I often went to read the papers. But previously I couldn't bring myself</p><p>to look at the wretched thing for more than two minutes; its whole tone</p><p>angered me. Depressed by the demonstration I had just seen, an inner voice</p><p>urged me to buy the paper in that tobacco shop and read it through. So I</p><p>brought it home with me and spent the whole evening reading it-despite</p><p>the steadily mounting rage provoked by a ceaseless outpouring of lies.</p><p>I now found that, in the social democratic daily papers, I could study</p><p>the inner nature of their thought-process far better than in all their</p><p>theoretical literature.</p><p>And what a striking difference there was between the two ! In the</p><p>literary text that dealt with Social Democracy theory, there was a display</p><p>76</p><p>CHAPTER 2</p><p>of high-sounding phraseology about liberty, human dignity, and beauty. It</p><p>was all promoted with an air of profound wisdom and calm prophetic</p><p>assurance-a meticulously-woven glitter of words to dazzle and mislead</p><p>the reader. On the other hand, the daily press hammered out this new</p><p>doctrine of human redemption in a most brutal fashion. No means were too</p><p>crude, provided they could be exploited in the slanderous campaign. These</p><p>journalists were experts in the art of deception and twisting facts. The</p><p>theoretical literature was intended for the middle-</p><p>and upper-class</p><p>' intellectuals, ' whereas the newspaper was intended for the masses.</p><p>This probing into books and newspapers, and studying the teachings</p><p>of Social Democracy, drew me back to my own people.</p><p>And thus what at first seemed an impassable chasm became the</p><p>occasion for a greater love.</p><p>With an understanding of the workings of the colossal system for</p><p>poisoning the popular mind, only a fool could blame the victims. During</p><p>the years that followed, I became more independent and, as I did so, I</p><p>became better able to understand the inner cause of the success of this</p><p>Social Democratic gospel. I now realized the meaning and purpose of those</p><p>brutal orders to read only 'Red' books and newspapers, and attend only</p><p>'Red' meetings. In the harsh light of reality, I saw the inevitable</p><p>consequences of that intolerant teaching.</p><p>The psyche of the masses is not receptive to anything half-hearted and</p><p>weak.</p><p>There are women whose inner sensibilities are not swayed by abstract</p><p>reasoning but are always subject to the influence of a vague emotional</p><p>longing for the strength that completes their being, and who would rather</p><p>bow to the strong man than dominate the weakling. Similarly, the masses</p><p>prefer the commander to the beggar, and they are filled with a stronger</p><p>sense of security by an unrivaled teaching than by one that offers them a</p><p>choice among many. They have very little idea of how to make such a</p><p>choice. Thus they are prone to feel that they have been abandoned. They</p><p>are equally unaware of their shameless spiritual terrorism and the impudent</p><p>abuse of their freedom; they haven't the slightest suspicion of the inner</p><p>insanity of the whole doctrine. They see only the ruthless force and brutality</p><p>of its calculated words, to which they always submit.</p><p>If Social Democracy were to be opposed by a more truthful but equally</p><p>brutal teaching, then this truthful teaching will ultimately prevail-even</p><p>though the struggle may be of the bitterest kind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Naofumi, post: 47452, member: 39"] I went away full of disgust. But at the same time, I was so deeply affected that it was quite impossible for me to ignore the whole situation and to stop thinking about it. When my anger began to calm down, my spirit of obstinacy got the upper hand and I decided that I would get back to work again in the building trade, at all costs. This decision became all the stronger a few weeks later, when my meager savings ran out and hunger clutched me once again in its merciless arms. I had no alternative. I got work again, but I soon had to leave for the same reasons as before. Then I asked myself: Are these men worthy of belonging to a great people? The question was profoundly disturbing. If the answer was 'Yes,' then the struggle to defend one's nationality is hardly worth all the pain and sacrifice we demand of our best men, if it only be in the interests of such rabble. On the other hand, if the answer was 'No,' then we are a nation of pitiful men. During those days of mental anguish and deep reflection, I envisioned an ever-increasing mass of people who could no longer be reckoned as belonging to their own nation. 2.14 THE SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC PRESS It was quite a different feeling a few days later, when I gazed at the endless columns, four abreast, of Viennese workmen parading at a mass demonstration! I stood dumbfounded for almost two hours, watching that enormous human dragon slowly uncoil itself in front of me. When I finally left the square and wandered home, I felt dismayed and depressed. On my way, I noticed the Arbeiter-Zeitung (The Worker's Journal) in a tobacco shop. This was the chief press-organ of the old Austrian Social Democracy. It was also available in a cheap cafe that I used to visit, and where I often went to read the papers. But previously I couldn't bring myself to look at the wretched thing for more than two minutes; its whole tone angered me. Depressed by the demonstration I had just seen, an inner voice urged me to buy the paper in that tobacco shop and read it through. So I brought it home with me and spent the whole evening reading it-despite the steadily mounting rage provoked by a ceaseless outpouring of lies. I now found that, in the social democratic daily papers, I could study the inner nature of their thought-process far better than in all their theoretical literature. And what a striking difference there was between the two ! In the literary text that dealt with Social Democracy theory, there was a display 76 CHAPTER 2 of high-sounding phraseology about liberty, human dignity, and beauty. It was all promoted with an air of profound wisdom and calm prophetic assurance-a meticulously-woven glitter of words to dazzle and mislead the reader. On the other hand, the daily press hammered out this new doctrine of human redemption in a most brutal fashion. No means were too crude, provided they could be exploited in the slanderous campaign. These journalists were experts in the art of deception and twisting facts. The theoretical literature was intended for the middle- and upper-class ' intellectuals, ' whereas the newspaper was intended for the masses. This probing into books and newspapers, and studying the teachings of Social Democracy, drew me back to my own people. And thus what at first seemed an impassable chasm became the occasion for a greater love. With an understanding of the workings of the colossal system for poisoning the popular mind, only a fool could blame the victims. During the years that followed, I became more independent and, as I did so, I became better able to understand the inner cause of the success of this Social Democratic gospel. I now realized the meaning and purpose of those brutal orders to read only 'Red' books and newspapers, and attend only 'Red' meetings. In the harsh light of reality, I saw the inevitable consequences of that intolerant teaching. The psyche of the masses is not receptive to anything half-hearted and weak. There are women whose inner sensibilities are not swayed by abstract reasoning but are always subject to the influence of a vague emotional longing for the strength that completes their being, and who would rather bow to the strong man than dominate the weakling. Similarly, the masses prefer the commander to the beggar, and they are filled with a stronger sense of security by an unrivaled teaching than by one that offers them a choice among many. They have very little idea of how to make such a choice. Thus they are prone to feel that they have been abandoned. They are equally unaware of their shameless spiritual terrorism and the impudent abuse of their freedom; they haven't the slightest suspicion of the inner insanity of the whole doctrine. They see only the ruthless force and brutality of its calculated words, to which they always submit. If Social Democracy were to be opposed by a more truthful but equally brutal teaching, then this truthful teaching will ultimately prevail-even though the struggle may be of the bitterest kind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Top
