Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Naofumi" data-source="post: 47459" data-attributes="member: 39"><p>employees and fighting for better living conditions and, on the other, as a</p><p>political instrument used by the party in the class struggle.</p><p>The Social Democrats understood the enormous importance of the</p><p>trade union movement. They appropriated it as a tool and used it with</p><p>success, while the bourgeois parties failed to understand it and thus lost</p><p>political prestige. They thought that their own arrogant 'rejection' would</p><p>arrest the logical development of the movement, forcing it into � illogical</p><p>position.</p><p>·</p><p>But it is absurd and false to say that the trade union movement is, in</p><p>itself, hostile to the nation. Rather, the opposite is true. If the activities of</p><p>the trade union are directed towards improving the condition of the</p><p>working-class, and are successful, such activities are not against the</p><p>Fatherland or the state but are, in the truest sense of the word, national. In</p><p>this way, the trade union organization helps to create social conditions that</p><p>are indispensable for a general system of national education. It deserves</p><p>high recognition when it destroys the intellectual and physical germs of</p><p>social disease, and thus promotes the general welfare of the nation.</p><p>It is superfluous to ask whether the trade union is necessary.</p><p>As long as there are employers who lack social understanding and have</p><p>wrong ideas of justice and fair play, it is not only the right but also the duty</p><p>of their employees-who are, after all, an integral part of our people-to</p><p>protect the public interest from individual greed and irrationality. To</p><p>safeguard the loyalty and confidence of the people is as much in the</p><p>interests of the nation as to safeguard public health.</p><p>Both are seriously menaced by dishonorable employers, who are</p><p>unaware of their duty as members of a national community. Their personal</p><p>greed or ruthlessness sows the seeds of future trouble.</p><p>To eliminate the causes of such a development is truly a service to the</p><p>nation.</p><p>One must not say that the individual worker is always free to escape</p><p>from the consequences of a perceived or actual injustice by an employer</p><p>in other words, that he is free to leave. No! That argument is only a ruse to</p><p>distract from the question at hand. Is it, or is it not, in the interests of the</p><p>nation to remove the causes of social unrest? If it is, then the fight must be</p><p>carried on with the only weapons that might prevail. But the individual</p><p>worker is never in a position to stand up against the power of the big</p><p>employer. The question here is not one that concerns the victory of that</p><p>which is right. If this were the guiding principle, then the conflict would</p><p>never have arisen. Rather, it is a question of who is stronger. If the case</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Naofumi, post: 47459, member: 39"] employees and fighting for better living conditions and, on the other, as a political instrument used by the party in the class struggle. The Social Democrats understood the enormous importance of the trade union movement. They appropriated it as a tool and used it with success, while the bourgeois parties failed to understand it and thus lost political prestige. They thought that their own arrogant 'rejection' would arrest the logical development of the movement, forcing it into � illogical position. · But it is absurd and false to say that the trade union movement is, in itself, hostile to the nation. Rather, the opposite is true. If the activities of the trade union are directed towards improving the condition of the working-class, and are successful, such activities are not against the Fatherland or the state but are, in the truest sense of the word, national. In this way, the trade union organization helps to create social conditions that are indispensable for a general system of national education. It deserves high recognition when it destroys the intellectual and physical germs of social disease, and thus promotes the general welfare of the nation. It is superfluous to ask whether the trade union is necessary. As long as there are employers who lack social understanding and have wrong ideas of justice and fair play, it is not only the right but also the duty of their employees-who are, after all, an integral part of our people-to protect the public interest from individual greed and irrationality. To safeguard the loyalty and confidence of the people is as much in the interests of the nation as to safeguard public health. Both are seriously menaced by dishonorable employers, who are unaware of their duty as members of a national community. Their personal greed or ruthlessness sows the seeds of future trouble. To eliminate the causes of such a development is truly a service to the nation. One must not say that the individual worker is always free to escape from the consequences of a perceived or actual injustice by an employer in other words, that he is free to leave. No! That argument is only a ruse to distract from the question at hand. Is it, or is it not, in the interests of the nation to remove the causes of social unrest? If it is, then the fight must be carried on with the only weapons that might prevail. But the individual worker is never in a position to stand up against the power of the big employer. The question here is not one that concerns the victory of that which is right. If this were the guiding principle, then the conflict would never have arisen. Rather, it is a question of who is stronger. If the case [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Top
