Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Naofumi" data-source="post: 47583" data-attributes="member: 39"><p>3.21 PAN-GERMANS AND PARLIAMENT</p><p>From this failure came the second cause of its rapid decline.</p><p>The position of the Germans in Austria was already desperate when</p><p>pan-Germanism arose. Year after year, parliament was being used more</p><p>and more as an instrument for the slow destruction of the German-Austrian</p><p>people. The only hope for an eleventh-hour effort to save it lay in the</p><p>overthrow of the parliamentary system; but there was very little prospect</p><p>of this happening.</p><p>Thus the movement was confronted with a question of primary</p><p>importance:</p><p>To overthrow the parliament, should the pan-Germanists have entered</p><p>it 'to undermine it from within,' as they say? Or should they have attacked</p><p>the institution as such from the outside?</p><p>They went in, and came out defeated.</p><p>But they were compelled to enter.</p><p>In order to wage an effective war against such a power from the outside,</p><p>indomitable courage and a ready spirit of sacrifice are necessary weapons.</p><p>In such cases, the bull must be seized by the horns. Furious attacks may drive</p><p>you to the ground again and again. But if you have a stout heart, you will</p><p>stand up, perhaps with broken bones. And only after a long and tough struggle</p><p>will you triumph. New fighters are attracted to a cause by the appeal of great</p><p>sacrifices made for its sake, until at last tenacity is rewarded with success.</p><p>For such a result, however, the children of the the great masses are</p><p>necessary.</p><p>They alone have the requisite determination and tenacity to fight</p><p>through to the end.</p><p>But the pan-German movement didn't have these broad masses, and</p><p>so the only other solution was to enter parliament.</p><p>It would be a mistake to think that this decision resulted from a long</p><p>series of internal moral hesitations, or that it was the outcome of careful</p><p>calculation. No; they didn't even consider another solution. Those who</p><p>participated in this blunder were motivated by vague notions regarding the</p><p>significance and effect of participating in an institution that they had</p><p>condemned on principle. In general, they hoped that they would thus be</p><p>able to promote their cause to the great masses of people, because they</p><p>could speak before 'the forum of the whole nation. ' Also, it seemed</p><p>reasonable to believe that by attacking the root of the evil, they would be</p><p>more effective than by attacking from outside. They believed that, if</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Naofumi, post: 47583, member: 39"] 3.21 PAN-GERMANS AND PARLIAMENT From this failure came the second cause of its rapid decline. The position of the Germans in Austria was already desperate when pan-Germanism arose. Year after year, parliament was being used more and more as an instrument for the slow destruction of the German-Austrian people. The only hope for an eleventh-hour effort to save it lay in the overthrow of the parliamentary system; but there was very little prospect of this happening. Thus the movement was confronted with a question of primary importance: To overthrow the parliament, should the pan-Germanists have entered it 'to undermine it from within,' as they say? Or should they have attacked the institution as such from the outside? They went in, and came out defeated. But they were compelled to enter. In order to wage an effective war against such a power from the outside, indomitable courage and a ready spirit of sacrifice are necessary weapons. In such cases, the bull must be seized by the horns. Furious attacks may drive you to the ground again and again. But if you have a stout heart, you will stand up, perhaps with broken bones. And only after a long and tough struggle will you triumph. New fighters are attracted to a cause by the appeal of great sacrifices made for its sake, until at last tenacity is rewarded with success. For such a result, however, the children of the the great masses are necessary. They alone have the requisite determination and tenacity to fight through to the end. But the pan-German movement didn't have these broad masses, and so the only other solution was to enter parliament. It would be a mistake to think that this decision resulted from a long series of internal moral hesitations, or that it was the outcome of careful calculation. No; they didn't even consider another solution. Those who participated in this blunder were motivated by vague notions regarding the significance and effect of participating in an institution that they had condemned on principle. In general, they hoped that they would thus be able to promote their cause to the great masses of people, because they could speak before 'the forum of the whole nation. ' Also, it seemed reasonable to believe that by attacking the root of the evil, they would be more effective than by attacking from outside. They believed that, if [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Top
