Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Naofumi" data-source="post: 47585" data-attributes="member: 39"><p>The press either ignored them totally or so mutilated their speeches</p><p>that the logical consistency was destroyed, and the meaning twisted around</p><p>in such a way that the public got the wrong impression of the aims of the</p><p>new movement. What the individual members said wasn't important. The</p><p>important matter was what people read as coming from them. This</p><p>consisted of mere extracts that had been taken out of context, and gave an</p><p>impression of incoherent nonsense-as was in fact intended. Thus the only</p><p>public before which they really spoke consisted of a mere 500</p><p>parliamentarians-and that says it all.</p><p>But the worst was the following:</p><p>The pan-German movement could only hope for success if the leaders</p><p>realized from the very start that it was not a question of a new party as of</p><p>a new worldview. This alone could arouse the inner moral forces that were</p><p>necessary for such a gigantic struggle. And for this struggle, the leaders</p><p>must be men of first-class minds and indomitable courage.</p><p>If the struggle on behalf of a worldview is not led by men of heroic</p><p>spirit who are ready to sacrifice everything, it will soon become impossible</p><p>to find real warriors who are ready to die for the cause. A man who fights</p><p>only for his own existence has little remaining for society.</p><p>In order to secure the requirements for success, everyone concerned</p><p>must understand that the new movement looks to posterity for its honor</p><p>and glory, and that it has nothing to offer to present-day members. If a</p><p>movement offers a large number of positions and offices to be filled, the</p><p>number of inferior candidates will constantly grow. Eventually, a day will</p><p>come when there will be such a preponderance of political profiteers that</p><p>the original combatants will now scarcely recognize their own party. They</p><p>may even be ejected by the later arrivals as unwanted ballast. At this point,</p><p>the 'mission' of the movement is lost.</p><p>Once the pan-Germanists decided to collaborate with parliament, they</p><p>were no longer leaders and combatants in a popular movement, but merely</p><p>'parliamentarians. ' The movement thus sank to the level of a common</p><p>political party, and no longer had the strength to face a hostile fate and defy</p><p>the risk of martyrdom. Instead of fighting, the pan-German leaders fell into</p><p>the habit of 'talking' and 'negotiating. ' These new parliamentarians soon</p><p>found that it was a more satisfactory, and less risky, way of fulfilling their</p><p>task: to defend their new worldview with the intellectual weapon of</p><p>parliamentary rhetoric rather than take up a fight in which they would risk</p><p>their lives. Such a fight would have uncertain outcomes, and offer no</p><p>possibility of personal gain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Naofumi, post: 47585, member: 39"] The press either ignored them totally or so mutilated their speeches that the logical consistency was destroyed, and the meaning twisted around in such a way that the public got the wrong impression of the aims of the new movement. What the individual members said wasn't important. The important matter was what people read as coming from them. This consisted of mere extracts that had been taken out of context, and gave an impression of incoherent nonsense-as was in fact intended. Thus the only public before which they really spoke consisted of a mere 500 parliamentarians-and that says it all. But the worst was the following: The pan-German movement could only hope for success if the leaders realized from the very start that it was not a question of a new party as of a new worldview. This alone could arouse the inner moral forces that were necessary for such a gigantic struggle. And for this struggle, the leaders must be men of first-class minds and indomitable courage. If the struggle on behalf of a worldview is not led by men of heroic spirit who are ready to sacrifice everything, it will soon become impossible to find real warriors who are ready to die for the cause. A man who fights only for his own existence has little remaining for society. In order to secure the requirements for success, everyone concerned must understand that the new movement looks to posterity for its honor and glory, and that it has nothing to offer to present-day members. If a movement offers a large number of positions and offices to be filled, the number of inferior candidates will constantly grow. Eventually, a day will come when there will be such a preponderance of political profiteers that the original combatants will now scarcely recognize their own party. They may even be ejected by the later arrivals as unwanted ballast. At this point, the 'mission' of the movement is lost. Once the pan-Germanists decided to collaborate with parliament, they were no longer leaders and combatants in a popular movement, but merely 'parliamentarians. ' The movement thus sank to the level of a common political party, and no longer had the strength to face a hostile fate and defy the risk of martyrdom. Instead of fighting, the pan-German leaders fell into the habit of 'talking' and 'negotiating. ' These new parliamentarians soon found that it was a more satisfactory, and less risky, way of fulfilling their task: to defend their new worldview with the intellectual weapon of parliamentary rhetoric rather than take up a fight in which they would risk their lives. Such a fight would have uncertain outcomes, and offer no possibility of personal gain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards
/rps/ - Religion, Philosophy & Spirituality
The aryan man is superior culturally, they are the founders of civilization Sieg Heil
Top
