Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
The history of facial/body aesthetic interpretations pre-21st century
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alurmo" data-source="post: 69765" data-attributes="member: 102"><p>yeah i feel more of a connection towards the med area and such, but they were at that time the best versions of aesthetics humanity had</p><p>I feel like I talked abt the best interpretations that put order to lookstheroy, I mean I can't just take what the lower-class people at the time thought were beautiful, bc they didn't have the aristocratic luxury of studying proportions, humans, etc...</p><p></p><p>I feel like u can really only look at the select few who had that luxury instead of talking abt unified theories, but i anyways didnt even fully get what ur tryinng to say with this reply. I can prob research abt if there even were unified beliefs of what is beautiful in society</p><p></p><p></p><p>yeah bc I was focusing on the philosophy of looks theory, if I had to make a thread abt what humanity thought was beautiful, I would have, it's also like that bc the original audience for this thread was .org, which, imo, this type of thread fits nicelythere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alurmo, post: 69765, member: 102"] yeah i feel more of a connection towards the med area and such, but they were at that time the best versions of aesthetics humanity had I feel like I talked abt the best interpretations that put order to lookstheroy, I mean I can't just take what the lower-class people at the time thought were beautiful, bc they didn't have the aristocratic luxury of studying proportions, humans, etc... I feel like u can really only look at the select few who had that luxury instead of talking abt unified theories, but i anyways didnt even fully get what ur tryinng to say with this reply. I can prob research abt if there even were unified beliefs of what is beautiful in society yeah bc I was focusing on the philosophy of looks theory, if I had to make a thread abt what humanity thought was beautiful, I would have, it's also like that bc the original audience for this thread was .org, which, imo, this type of thread fits nicelythere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
The history of facial/body aesthetic interpretations pre-21st century
Top
