Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 65865" data-attributes="member: 544">It’s cute that you brought up the Mongols, but you’re literally making my point for me. You admitted they were &#039;next to the silk trade&#039;—that is the definition of geographical luck. They didn&#039;t build the road; they just happened to be born on the only flat, East-West superhighway on the planet.Your &#039;soft land&#039; theory for mineral mining is pure fan-fiction—industrialization happened where coal and iron were close together, which is just geological happenstance. You’re trying so hard to find &#039;nobility&#039; and &#039;genetics&#039; in what is essentially just a lucky starting position on the map.When you fall back on &#039;racial incapability,&#039; it just sounds like you’re scared of a world where your own &#039;superior&#039; status isn&#039;t guaranteed by your DNA. It’s a weak shield for a weak worldview. If you had been born in a Tsetse-fly swamp with no horses and no Silk Road, your &#039;logistics software&#039; wouldn&#039;t have saved you from being just another guy in a hut.Go back to your spreadsheets, man. Real history is written by the terrain, not by your &#039;hominid admixture&#039; cope.It’s funny that you’re crying about &#039;character smears&#039; while your post is full of slurs—that’s not an argument, that’s just a tantrum. In a real debate, you’d be laughed off the stage for thinking &#039;Ghost DNA&#039; excuses your failure to understand how a Tsetse fly kills an empire faster than a spreadsheet can save it.You’re not &#039;taking my points into consideration&#039;; you’re just ducking them because you’re terrified that your &#039;superiority&#039; is actually just a result of where your ancestors happened to park their horses. Keep your admixtures and your anger—I&#039;ll keep the actual map.&quot;P.sStarting a rebuttal with ‘bad argument’ is the hallmark of a novice debater—in a real forensics round, you’d be docked points for using dismissive posturing as a substitute for actual logic. If you have to tell me it’s a bad argument instead of just proving it, it’s clear which one of us is actually leaning on a script. Better luck next round, &#039;Warlord&#039;. TL;DR ?Local autistic man is big mad <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🫵🏻" title="Index pointing at the viewer: light skin tone&nbsp; &nbsp; :index_pointing_at_the_viewer_tone1:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1faf5-1f3fb.png" data-shortname=":index_pointing_at_the_viewer_tone1:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 65865, member: 544"] It’s cute that you brought up the Mongols, but you’re literally making my point for me. You admitted they were 'next to the silk trade'—that is the definition of geographical luck. They didn't build the road; they just happened to be born on the only flat, East-West superhighway on the planet. Your 'soft land' theory for mineral mining is pure fan-fiction—industrialization happened where coal and iron were close together, which is just geological happenstance. You’re trying so hard to find 'nobility' and 'genetics' in what is essentially just a lucky starting position on the map. When you fall back on 'racial incapability,' it just sounds like you’re scared of a world where your own 'superior' status isn't guaranteed by your DNA. It’s a weak shield for a weak worldview. If you had been born in a Tsetse-fly swamp with no horses and no Silk Road, your 'logistics software' wouldn't have saved you from being just another guy in a hut. Go back to your spreadsheets, man. Real history is written by the terrain, not by your 'hominid admixture' cope. It’s funny that you’re crying about 'character smears' while your post is full of slurs—that’s not an argument, that’s just a tantrum. In a real debate, you’d be laughed off the stage for thinking 'Ghost DNA' excuses your failure to understand how a Tsetse fly kills an empire faster than a spreadsheet can save it. You’re not 'taking my points into consideration'; you’re just ducking them because you’re terrified that your 'superiority' is actually just a result of where your ancestors happened to park their horses. Keep your admixtures and your anger—I'll keep the actual map." P.s Starting a rebuttal with ‘bad argument’ is the hallmark of a novice debater—in a real forensics round, you’d be docked points for using dismissive posturing as a substitute for actual logic. If you have to tell me it’s a bad argument instead of just proving it, it’s clear which one of us is actually leaning on a script. Better luck next round, 'Warlord'. TL;DR ? Local autistic man is big mad 🫵🏻 [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread