Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Konrad Cruze" data-source="post: 65872" data-attributes="member: 542">Your TL;DR is a projection here because my reply here was calm. My next reply is where I was mad and used offensive terms. Your P.s also shows some sort of insecurity about someone calling you incompetent in the subject matter. I just stated I found your argument poor. That isn&#039;t a big deal. You, on the other hand, like the other guy, have thrown immature remarks from the get-go and ignored my points while only doubling down on your own. Just like I stated in the other reply, which you can reply to here. You are refusing to tackle the Ghost Hominid admixture part without even properly refuting it, saying it doesn&#039;t matter, and just keep saying it doesn&#039;t matter, thinking it can work if you repeat yourself. But I can repeat myself too. Also, forgot I admitted both positive and negative if Zimbabweans and Mongolians. You once again, like how I pointed out in that reply, stated this is why it was a bad argument, only took positive for the Mongols and negative for the Zimbabweans. You ignored that Zimbabweans were also born near a trade hub. First the one. Arab established and then later the European after the Ottomans blocked the Spanish and Portuguese from trading through them. You also ignored the fact that Zimbabwean when interacting with those on the trade route, only imported food and tools for luxury. They fixed their food problem by trading their materials for them. However, it was more than enough and the houses they build was mostly luxurious. They didn&#039;t try to build any sustainable infrastructure or improve their mining capabilities. Not even trying to get medicine and fertilizer that would have been enough.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Konrad Cruze, post: 65872, member: 542"] Your TL;DR is a projection here because my reply here was calm. My next reply is where I was mad and used offensive terms. Your P.s also shows some sort of insecurity about someone calling you incompetent in the subject matter. I just stated I found your argument poor. That isn't a big deal. You, on the other hand, like the other guy, have thrown immature remarks from the get-go and ignored my points while only doubling down on your own. Just like I stated in the other reply, which you can reply to here. You are refusing to tackle the Ghost Hominid admixture part without even properly refuting it, saying it doesn't matter, and just keep saying it doesn't matter, thinking it can work if you repeat yourself. But I can repeat myself too. Also, forgot I admitted both positive and negative if Zimbabweans and Mongolians. You once again, like how I pointed out in that reply, stated this is why it was a bad argument, only took positive for the Mongols and negative for the Zimbabweans. You ignored that Zimbabweans were also born near a trade hub. First the one. Arab established and then later the European after the Ottomans blocked the Spanish and Portuguese from trading through them. You also ignored the fact that Zimbabwean when interacting with those on the trade route, only imported food and tools for luxury. They fixed their food problem by trading their materials for them. However, it was more than enough and the houses they build was mostly luxurious. They didn't try to build any sustainable infrastructure or improve their mining capabilities. Not even trying to get medicine and fertilizer that would have been enough. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread