Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Konrad Cruze" data-source="post: 66065" data-attributes="member: 542">&quot;at this point, the only thing more transparent than your insecurity is your absolute lack of basic reading comprehension.&quot;&quot;have some phantom &quot;political bias&quot; because their conclusions don&#039;t match your /pol/ fan fiction.&quot;&quot;your ancestors were dying of the plague in mud-caked hovels.&quot;&quot;because the reality—that you’re just a mediocre guy with no discipline and a bad attitude—is clearly too much for you to handle. I&#039;m done wasting my time on a chud who can&#039;t even breed his way out of a paper bag.&quot;&quot;You sit here roleplaying as a superior &quot;Master&quot; of civilization, yet you’re posting on other boards that you can&#039;t even afford a house or start a family. You aren&#039;t a warlord; you’re a childless, bitter clerk in a &quot;Stage 3 stress wreck&quot; who needs to believe in &quot;racial IQ&quot; just to have a reason to get out of bed in the morning. You are disingenuous, insufferable, and frankly, I feel sorry for anyone who has to interact with you in person&quot;&quot;because you need a biological boogeyman to feel like you aren&#039;t at the bottom of the food chain.&quot;This is hilarious, you say I am crashing out while a good portion of your comments are nothing but insults. At least I was able to prove you as someone debating in bad faith. I gave my closing argument by directly pointing at your own argument while you created fantasies of me being a loser. You even claim I think of myself as a member of some sort of superior race. Even though we first met in the Elysian chat, where I denounced my own race for subhuman behavior. Then you keep talking about /pol/, which is out of place because all my arguments pointed toward an actual website, article, or research findings, not /pol/. You try to claim I got these findings from an unreliable site even though they were official publishing of federal bodies and other well recognized organizations. Another cheap attempt at smearing my argument without properly tackling me. As for your actual arguments, of course, I am not tackling them because I said I am not participating because you obviously are debating in bad faith.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Konrad Cruze, post: 66065, member: 542"] "at this point, the only thing more transparent than your insecurity is your absolute lack of basic reading comprehension." "have some phantom "political bias" because their conclusions don't match your /pol/ fan fiction." "your ancestors were dying of the plague in mud-caked hovels." "because the reality—that you’re just a mediocre guy with no discipline and a bad attitude—is clearly too much for you to handle. I'm done wasting my time on a chud who can't even breed his way out of a paper bag." "You sit here roleplaying as a superior "Master" of civilization, yet you’re posting on other boards that you can't even afford a house or start a family. You aren't a warlord; you’re a childless, bitter clerk in a "Stage 3 stress wreck" who needs to believe in "racial IQ" just to have a reason to get out of bed in the morning. You are disingenuous, insufferable, and frankly, I feel sorry for anyone who has to interact with you in person" "because you need a biological boogeyman to feel like you aren't at the bottom of the food chain." This is hilarious, you say I am crashing out while a good portion of your comments are nothing but insults. At least I was able to prove you as someone debating in bad faith. I gave my closing argument by directly pointing at your own argument while you created fantasies of me being a loser. You even claim I think of myself as a member of some sort of superior race. Even though we first met in the Elysian chat, where I denounced my own race for subhuman behavior. Then you keep talking about /pol/, which is out of place because all my arguments pointed toward an actual website, article, or research findings, not /pol/. You try to claim I got these findings from an unreliable site even though they were official publishing of federal bodies and other well recognized organizations. Another cheap attempt at smearing my argument without properly tackling me. As for your actual arguments, of course, I am not tackling them because I said I am not participating because you obviously are debating in bad faith. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread