Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
The Rothschild base in Antarctica
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolfstorm" data-source="post: 76688" data-attributes="member: 612"><p>The history of other civilizations could be fake as well. Remember the clay warriors in China? Some say they are fake. So are most of dinosaur bones in museums, they can be made of compounds that simulate bones. Fomenko said something about eclipse data as well, for instance he says there was a eclipse during Jesus crucification, but his data points to the Vatican being the place where that happened, not the middle east.</p><p>Of course, you dont need to believe everything he says, and you have to question both sides of the discussion. But history is a mess of lies, and not just recent history, the entire past of this world is up to be questioned. History is treated as a religion, specially ancient history.</p><p>I can't ignore the similarities between these emperors, and these generic names based on constant (the noun) which indicates these were titles. For me, Octavius and Constantine could be the same guy. Also why Romania is called Romania, if the dacians were (according to official history) not romans? Why are gypsies called romani? Roma was probably a region, spanning from Transylvania down to the Peloponese, and Constantinople was the original capital (not because of Constantine, but because of the constant title). Rome, the city, was found by migrants, and Aeneas the trojan could just be from the original Roma. Then the empire expanded, and the province of Gaul was ruled by Charlemagne, who sit on Aachen which was a small city.</p><p>In my view, this crackpot version of history is much better than the bureaucratic slop they present at Academia. Everything fits and history becomes colorful. The Hollywood brown attributed to the middle ages is replaced by colorful heraldry which is actually roman in origin, and roman history is no longer the boring summer they paint at universities.</p><p></p><p>As for Flat Earth, that's a psyop to discredit historical revisionism. Many of these youtubers who focus on Tartaria usually dont talk about Rome. For them, eveything was Tartaria.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolfstorm, post: 76688, member: 612"] The history of other civilizations could be fake as well. Remember the clay warriors in China? Some say they are fake. So are most of dinosaur bones in museums, they can be made of compounds that simulate bones. Fomenko said something about eclipse data as well, for instance he says there was a eclipse during Jesus crucification, but his data points to the Vatican being the place where that happened, not the middle east. Of course, you dont need to believe everything he says, and you have to question both sides of the discussion. But history is a mess of lies, and not just recent history, the entire past of this world is up to be questioned. History is treated as a religion, specially ancient history. I can't ignore the similarities between these emperors, and these generic names based on constant (the noun) which indicates these were titles. For me, Octavius and Constantine could be the same guy. Also why Romania is called Romania, if the dacians were (according to official history) not romans? Why are gypsies called romani? Roma was probably a region, spanning from Transylvania down to the Peloponese, and Constantinople was the original capital (not because of Constantine, but because of the constant title). Rome, the city, was found by migrants, and Aeneas the trojan could just be from the original Roma. Then the empire expanded, and the province of Gaul was ruled by Charlemagne, who sit on Aachen which was a small city. In my view, this crackpot version of history is much better than the bureaucratic slop they present at Academia. Everything fits and history becomes colorful. The Hollywood brown attributed to the middle ages is replaced by colorful heraldry which is actually roman in origin, and roman history is no longer the boring summer they paint at universities. As for Flat Earth, that's a psyop to discredit historical revisionism. Many of these youtubers who focus on Tartaria usually dont talk about Rome. For them, eveything was Tartaria. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
The Rothschild base in Antarctica
Top