- Thread Author
- #1
Gentleman, as far as is our concern this is what I conclude:
There is such a thing as cowardice, perspective and relative and objective perception. This means that in this material realm, there being right and wrong, the easy behavior is to allow what is absurd to continue and what is right to go silent- easily does evil walk as a lion, because the people are a force that is weak and bind, if Monty Python were alive he ought to make a comedy about a world who's people believe firmly and stoutly (comically even) that other men have the right to rule over them, making the contradictions clear and obvious.
A husband own his wife, but the husband is at the mercy of his wife. The man thinks to himself, wait if she's my property, isn't she my slave? The women thinks to herself, if I control my husband through the use of my body isn't he a slave to me? They both say to each other "everyone has a master and everyone is a slave".
Would it not be wise to get to the heart and see the circle and not the square and linear brain? Personally its not asked enough in anyone educational circle or even in the common internet sphere's of influence. If you ask a person of today, what is the best form of government- you receive a treasure of answers, but all go towards one pattern. They all believe someone should rule over them, or that no government should exist and yet they have not a plan in mind. What does this look like exactly?
Imagine a tree from the top, you have the full grown of the branches (which are ideas), but look ever carefully and you find the roots unexamined. Start with a question, what is political science?
We have one definition:
political science
Now what does every government on Earth have in common? They all govern people, what did the socialist advocate for? A stateless society where the means of production are controlled by the proletarian class, how then would they achieve it? Let Marx speak for himself:
1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country
10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
To summarize what he really is writing- power should be put in the hands of the state and these are the means by which we will achieve it. In reality his ideas are simply devilish to say the least, because where is the power going to be centralized? In the very hands of the very concept which keeps man in chains. Really, we should say that political science studies the way in which governments control their people for when has a common man ever actually held sway over someone he has little to no idea about?
"No man wishes to confront the elusive obvious for if he was presented with the truth of the matter, it would not be to his liking, but rather a hindrance to his religious belief's"
-Hierophant
"If the devil has a philosophy, would it not be wise, to have his play book?"
-Hierophant
"If you want to get nowhere, get a group of idiots and have them circle jerk to no conclusion- under the guise that they are justified all the while the world burns due to their apathy."
-Hierophant
"Isn't interesting that the ideas that man espouses are all but words, words, words? For if you ask the man who gave you his ideas, to derail him ask him how he will implant these ideas and when? I believe he may have forgotten that requires sacrifice."
The theory is that there is objective truth which can be demonstrated and found, the practice is using this understanding (the demonstrated fact) and then by putting it into physical reality we will see results.
There is such a thing as cowardice, perspective and relative and objective perception. This means that in this material realm, there being right and wrong, the easy behavior is to allow what is absurd to continue and what is right to go silent- easily does evil walk as a lion, because the people are a force that is weak and bind, if Monty Python were alive he ought to make a comedy about a world who's people believe firmly and stoutly (comically even) that other men have the right to rule over them, making the contradictions clear and obvious.
A husband own his wife, but the husband is at the mercy of his wife. The man thinks to himself, wait if she's my property, isn't she my slave? The women thinks to herself, if I control my husband through the use of my body isn't he a slave to me? They both say to each other "everyone has a master and everyone is a slave".
Would it not be wise to get to the heart and see the circle and not the square and linear brain? Personally its not asked enough in anyone educational circle or even in the common internet sphere's of influence. If you ask a person of today, what is the best form of government- you receive a treasure of answers, but all go towards one pattern. They all believe someone should rule over them, or that no government should exist and yet they have not a plan in mind. What does this look like exactly?
Imagine a tree from the top, you have the full grown of the branches (which are ideas), but look ever carefully and you find the roots unexamined. Start with a question, what is political science?
We have one definition:
political science
noun
- The study of the processes, principles, and structure of government and of political institutions.
- The systematic study of government and politics.
- The analytical study of public policy and policies, past, present, and prospective.
- The study of government of states and other political units.
Now what does every government on Earth have in common? They all govern people, what did the socialist advocate for? A stateless society where the means of production are controlled by the proletarian class, how then would they achieve it? Let Marx speak for himself:
1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country
10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
To summarize what he really is writing- power should be put in the hands of the state and these are the means by which we will achieve it. In reality his ideas are simply devilish to say the least, because where is the power going to be centralized? In the very hands of the very concept which keeps man in chains. Really, we should say that political science studies the way in which governments control their people for when has a common man ever actually held sway over someone he has little to no idea about?
"No man wishes to confront the elusive obvious for if he was presented with the truth of the matter, it would not be to his liking, but rather a hindrance to his religious belief's"
-Hierophant
"If the devil has a philosophy, would it not be wise, to have his play book?"
-Hierophant
"If you want to get nowhere, get a group of idiots and have them circle jerk to no conclusion- under the guise that they are justified all the while the world burns due to their apathy."
-Hierophant
"Isn't interesting that the ideas that man espouses are all but words, words, words? For if you ask the man who gave you his ideas, to derail him ask him how he will implant these ideas and when? I believe he may have forgotten that requires sacrifice."
The theory is that there is objective truth which can be demonstrated and found, the practice is using this understanding (the demonstrated fact) and then by putting it into physical reality we will see results.
