Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Elysium
There will be a male deflation before a post-scarcity world
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Depresso" data-source="post: 84621" data-attributes="member: 347"><p>The point isn't to fight back or to have women fight men, it's about how society rearranges itself in a post-scarcity world. The socio-economic environment is failing to produce heterosexual men that are appealing to women because it's incentivised to do the opposite. They don't want to supply the men's needs, their needs aren't "needs", they're "nice-to-haves" or dismissed as "misogynistic". At least you're free to work and consume as long as you can work. Gym, protein, anything that adds to your non-economic appeal will be politically incorrect and attacked in the future — "you don't deserve to be desired, you can buy what you want".</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://elysianfields.se/threads/why-are-humans-such-misandrists-why-is-beauty-always-a-difficult-issue-and-why-must-man-be-poor.9222/[/URL]</p><p>^ The twitter screenshot is a man virtue-signaling and jestering misandry towards the male gaze. The misandrist Karens always existed just like real misogynists do but they're politically useful now to manufacture consent against men.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's all that's left now because of AI, the easy jobs if anything. It's over for this idea that men can do things because difficult things are obsolete. What's left is to just be a man and help raise and keep other men in good condition but "being needed to do something" is completely over.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, that's if the men had economic value but in an economy with fewer human jobs, it's just a trade union of ken dolls and skinnyfat malding NEETS. "Or enough men say fuck it", no they wont <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite325" alt=":jfl:" title="JFL :jfl:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":jfl:" />. The closest we had to that was Andrew Tate but now digital ID and on-device AI scanning will handle that before it starts. That's all over now.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]pUOxDODDGRY[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>"You were made a certain way, someone else is made a different way and then the environment changes"</p><p></p><p>He's blaming pornography but that's not the real problem, if it was a problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It would be good for women if more men were attractive because of choice and power dynamics, but society which includes other men, doesn't want that. It's not a gender-war, it's just economics and human nature. You don't really need many men to maintain a population in a post-scarcity world.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]18204[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Depresso, post: 84621, member: 347"] The point isn't to fight back or to have women fight men, it's about how society rearranges itself in a post-scarcity world. The socio-economic environment is failing to produce heterosexual men that are appealing to women because it's incentivised to do the opposite. They don't want to supply the men's needs, their needs aren't "needs", they're "nice-to-haves" or dismissed as "misogynistic". At least you're free to work and consume as long as you can work. Gym, protein, anything that adds to your non-economic appeal will be politically incorrect and attacked in the future — "you don't deserve to be desired, you can buy what you want". [URL unfurl="true"]https://elysianfields.se/threads/why-are-humans-such-misandrists-why-is-beauty-always-a-difficult-issue-and-why-must-man-be-poor.9222/[/URL] ^ The twitter screenshot is a man virtue-signaling and jestering misandry towards the male gaze. The misandrist Karens always existed just like real misogynists do but they're politically useful now to manufacture consent against men. That's all that's left now because of AI, the easy jobs if anything. It's over for this idea that men can do things because difficult things are obsolete. What's left is to just be a man and help raise and keep other men in good condition but "being needed to do something" is completely over. Yes, that's if the men had economic value but in an economy with fewer human jobs, it's just a trade union of ken dolls and skinnyfat malding NEETS. "Or enough men say fuck it", no they wont :jfl:. The closest we had to that was Andrew Tate but now digital ID and on-device AI scanning will handle that before it starts. That's all over now. [MEDIA=youtube]pUOxDODDGRY[/MEDIA] "You were made a certain way, someone else is made a different way and then the environment changes" He's blaming pornography but that's not the real problem, if it was a problem. It would be good for women if more men were attractive because of choice and power dynamics, but society which includes other men, doesn't want that. It's not a gender-war, it's just economics and human nature. You don't really need many men to maintain a population in a post-scarcity world. [ATTACH type="full" width="218px" alt="kabukicho-host-bar-1222472777.jpg"]18204[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Elysium
There will be a male deflation before a post-scarcity world
Top
