Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Tartarus
Was Ted Kaczynski trans-confused?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Depresso" data-source="post: 78077" data-attributes="member: 347"><p>Full disclosure, I believe in proselytizing:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Free speech</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Pro-choice for everything, for anything sentient</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Anti-transhumanism (protect the integrity of humanity)</li> </ol><p>You can only fix and make better the roulette slots you're not in so if you drop into a shit one, you can only wait for another spin, which could take forever for you. You can't make these better without help from similarly minded people.</p><p></p><p>If I paraphrase Epstine from a 2 hour interview, you can't say you know a system you can't predict, so we can't say what our current economy is doing to people until the poor people speak up and point fingers. If the problem is serious, there will be campaigns to discredit the victims which sucks. Memes and speech shouldn't be banned.</p><p></p><p>Pro-choice is consent to exist for sentient beings, which moves focus onto QoL and effectively disables<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_of_astronomical_suffering" target="_blank"> entire trunks of branches of s-risks</a>, because economies that depend on shitty lives can't come into existence (and then be maintained by a corrupt elite).</p><p></p><p>Transhumanism is just old problems with newer ways to suck, so just cure and solve the problems instead. If life was a bicep, make the middle bigger and juicier <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🍽️" title="Fork and knife with plate :fork_knife_plate:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f37d.png" data-shortname=":fork_knife_plate:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Depresso, post: 78077, member: 347"] Full disclosure, I believe in proselytizing: [LIST=1] [*]Free speech [*]Pro-choice for everything, for anything sentient [*]Anti-transhumanism (protect the integrity of humanity) [/LIST] You can only fix and make better the roulette slots you're not in so if you drop into a shit one, you can only wait for another spin, which could take forever for you. You can't make these better without help from similarly minded people. If I paraphrase Epstine from a 2 hour interview, you can't say you know a system you can't predict, so we can't say what our current economy is doing to people until the poor people speak up and point fingers. If the problem is serious, there will be campaigns to discredit the victims which sucks. Memes and speech shouldn't be banned. Pro-choice is consent to exist for sentient beings, which moves focus onto QoL and effectively disables[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_of_astronomical_suffering'] entire trunks of branches of s-risks[/URL], because economies that depend on shitty lives can't come into existence (and then be maintained by a corrupt elite). Transhumanism is just old problems with newer ways to suck, so just cure and solve the problems instead. If life was a bicep, make the middle bigger and juicier 🍽️ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Tartarus
Was Ted Kaczynski trans-confused?
Top