Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GGWP" data-source="post: 43196" data-attributes="member: 93">Oh really, what are the principles of your philosophy? What is your &#039;solution&#039; to the blackpill? I&#039;ve read into your &#039;maskpill&#039; and it reads like an abridged redpill rather than a logical fleshing out of the whitepill. In my opinion being a &#039;warrior&#039; isn&#039;t a solution, this is just the redpill (or even bluepilled, assuming that you can just transcend biology through personality, grit) which is trying to &#039;prove&#039; your own masculinity out of ego, this is the most prominent belief championed by normal males with testosterone between the ages of 18-25. There is no acknowledgement of biological determinism of the blackpill in this which is a post-Nietzchean conception heavily intertwined with nuanced 21st century Evolutionary Biology, Nietzchean nihilism would therefore be more pertinent to redpill or bluepill philosophy because it aligns with preconceptions about &#039;becoming ideal&#039; in the sense that a 19th century man with no conception of 20/21st century science would term ideal. The problem is that Nietzche conflates religion with being a mere belief system when it is a bio-psycho-social caste/organism, therefore the Nietzchean &#039;will-to-power&#039; and &#039;Ubermensch&#039; is based on a flawed conception of religion and the mind from the past.The &#039;whitepill&#039; as a defined concept should be post-biological-determinist and fundamentally anti-nihilist and, as Tabula Rasa has expounded there is a strong association with anti-materialist, religious mindset such as Buddhism and Taoism due to the benefits a religious mindset can have not least with staving off social defeat. The issue with your brand of ideology is that the Nietzchean &#039;warrior&#039; mindset is cultivated by its genotype (success of pre-modern miltary such as Spartans can be attributed to eugenics, collectivist bottlenecking of the population to manufacture a genetically close population capable of comprehending shared values); there is no acknowledgement of the fundamental differences between people or how to address such differences. It also heaps the blame on individuals rather than acknowledging that nobody can really choose their circumstances.The whitepill should be concerned with finding pragmatic, anti-nihilist solutions to the blackpill that is not based in redpill egoism or bluepill denialism. This might include religious mindset (to stave off social defeat and unify communities), effective accelerationism (to reduce biological inequalities) and altruistic advocacy or holistic Evolutionary Survival Strategy. In practice this would be more like tech minimalism, religious resurgence as metaphysical rather than literal teachings, accelerationism, ascetism, mutual compassion, intense realism, rationalism and utopianism. It would require critically analyzing the kind of stable strategies that would be present in the society you want to live in, which is a long-term planning mechanism that the bluepill, redpill and blackpill lacks.When I talk of &#039;slaying the hydra&#039;, this refers to nihilism in general, of which Blackpill is yet another &#039;head&#039; of. I think we are facing many threats of meaning in the 21st century what with looming post-scarcity, self-referential biological determinism (humans are not &#039;equipped&#039; to realize their own nature, necessarily), the muddling of the nature of consciousness itself and the rise of radical atheism. The Aquarian age requires ideological innovation that takes into account updated 21st century science.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GGWP, post: 43196, member: 93"] Oh really, what are the principles of your philosophy? What is your 'solution' to the blackpill? I've read into your 'maskpill' and it reads like an abridged redpill rather than a logical fleshing out of the whitepill. In my opinion being a 'warrior' isn't a solution, this is just the redpill (or even bluepilled, assuming that you can just transcend biology through personality, grit) which is trying to 'prove' your own masculinity out of ego, this is the most prominent belief championed by normal males with testosterone between the ages of 18-25. There is no acknowledgement of biological determinism of the blackpill in this which is a post-Nietzchean conception heavily intertwined with nuanced 21st century Evolutionary Biology, Nietzchean nihilism would therefore be more pertinent to redpill or bluepill philosophy because it aligns with preconceptions about 'becoming ideal' in the sense that a 19th century man with no conception of 20/21st century science would term ideal. The problem is that Nietzche conflates religion with being a mere belief system when it is a bio-psycho-social caste/organism, therefore the Nietzchean 'will-to-power' and 'Ubermensch' is based on a flawed conception of religion and the mind from the past. The 'whitepill' as a defined concept should be post-biological-determinist and fundamentally anti-nihilist and, as Tabula Rasa has expounded there is a strong association with anti-materialist, religious mindset such as Buddhism and Taoism due to the benefits a religious mindset can have not least with staving off social defeat. The issue with your brand of ideology is that the Nietzchean 'warrior' mindset is cultivated by its genotype (success of pre-modern miltary such as Spartans can be attributed to eugenics, collectivist bottlenecking of the population to manufacture a genetically close population capable of comprehending shared values); there is no acknowledgement of the fundamental differences between people or how to address such differences. It also heaps the blame on individuals rather than acknowledging that nobody can really choose their circumstances. The whitepill should be concerned with finding pragmatic, anti-nihilist solutions to the blackpill that is not based in redpill egoism or bluepill denialism. This might include religious mindset (to stave off social defeat and unify communities), effective accelerationism (to reduce biological inequalities) and altruistic advocacy or holistic Evolutionary Survival Strategy. In practice this would be more like tech minimalism, religious resurgence as metaphysical rather than literal teachings, accelerationism, ascetism, mutual compassion, intense realism, rationalism and utopianism. It would require critically analyzing the kind of stable strategies that would be present in the society you want to live in, which is a long-term planning mechanism that the bluepill, redpill and blackpill lacks. When I talk of 'slaying the hydra', this refers to nihilism in general, of which Blackpill is yet another 'head' of. I think we are facing many threats of meaning in the 21st century what with looming post-scarcity, self-referential biological determinism (humans are not 'equipped' to realize their own nature, necessarily), the muddling of the nature of consciousness itself and the rise of radical atheism. The Aquarian age requires ideological innovation that takes into account updated 21st century science. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Layout Options

Color Schemes

Reply to thread