Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Tartarus
We desperately need an antinormie philosopher.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porco-dddio" data-source="post: 87425" data-attributes="member: 656"><p>In the last century, we had the normie century. This gave birth to the concept of "the mass."</p><p></p><p>Psychologists started to describe the mass and find solutions. Elites had a dialog open about it in the previous centuries. This concept led elites to invent communism and nazism. Later, elites opened international economy schools and mixed behavioral psychology and social sciences, leading to the present world economic forum with their theory on human happiness. </p><p></p><p>Over time, the normies acquired their champions. I call them "the hypernormies." These are normie philosophers who exaggerate the normie delusion. People like Guenon and Giulio Ebola and Nietzsche.</p><p></p><p>Durin the normie centuries, in reaction to nietzsche, there came dannunzio. He had a model of the superuomo. This model is attainable and demonstrable, unlike the ubermensch. Dannunzio is the only philosopher I think defends the schizo cause. But it also favors the normie model of psycho vs sheeple. Im not super deep into philosophy so probably im missing some other people. </p><p></p><p>Of the ones I know, only dannunzio had a philosophy that can undermine nietzsche, joker and taxidriver. But it isnt yet what we need. </p><p></p><p>What we need is a model that contrasts with the hypernormie "perennialism" from the normie philosophers. We need a new way.</p><p></p><p>Normies went too far with christianity, nazism and communism and these other things. I think none of us should have his way and we need a balance. Normies cannot be allowed to win.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porco-dddio, post: 87425, member: 656"] In the last century, we had the normie century. This gave birth to the concept of "the mass." Psychologists started to describe the mass and find solutions. Elites had a dialog open about it in the previous centuries. This concept led elites to invent communism and nazism. Later, elites opened international economy schools and mixed behavioral psychology and social sciences, leading to the present world economic forum with their theory on human happiness. Over time, the normies acquired their champions. I call them "the hypernormies." These are normie philosophers who exaggerate the normie delusion. People like Guenon and Giulio Ebola and Nietzsche. Durin the normie centuries, in reaction to nietzsche, there came dannunzio. He had a model of the superuomo. This model is attainable and demonstrable, unlike the ubermensch. Dannunzio is the only philosopher I think defends the schizo cause. But it also favors the normie model of psycho vs sheeple. Im not super deep into philosophy so probably im missing some other people. Of the ones I know, only dannunzio had a philosophy that can undermine nietzsche, joker and taxidriver. But it isnt yet what we need. What we need is a model that contrasts with the hypernormie "perennialism" from the normie philosophers. We need a new way. Normies went too far with christianity, nazism and communism and these other things. I think none of us should have his way and we need a balance. Normies cannot be allowed to win. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Tartarus
We desperately need an antinormie philosopher.
Top