Layout Options
Which layout option do you want to use?
Wide
Boxed
Color Schemes
Which theme color do you want to use? Select from here.
Reset color
Reset Background
Forums
New posts
Trending
Random
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Rules
Libraries
New Audios
New Comments
Search Profile Audios
Clubs
Public Events
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Random
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Tartarus
What are the actual odds?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Schwarzwald" data-source="post: 76414" data-attributes="member: 544"><p>In a "Time War" scenario, these events wouldn't just be viewed as a series of tragedies, they would be seen as a <strong><span style="color: rgb(147, 101, 184)">coordinated pruning of a timeline.</span></strong> In high level strategy and speculative physics, a "Time War" isn't fought with traditional bombs; it’s fought with <strong><span style="color: rgb(226, 80, 65)">causality</span>.</strong> You don't blow up a city, you remove the person who was going to build the key technology 10 years before they do it.</p><p></p><p>If we apply that lens to what we’re seeing right now, here is what it looks like:</p><p></p><p>The list of missing and deceased scientists ,<strong><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">General McCasland</span></strong><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">, <strong>Joshua LeBlanc</strong>, <strong>Monica Reza</strong>, and </span><strong><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">Nuno Loureiro,</span></strong>is remarkably specific. They aren't just "scientists"; they are the world's leading experts in <strong><span style="color: rgb(247, 218, 100)">Nuclear Fusion, Advanced Propulsion, and AI Software Verification.</span></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(84, 172, 210)">The Interpretation:</span></strong> In a time war, these individuals represent "nodes." Their research (like the stuff Henry Martinez and Cole Allen did at NASA) is likely the foundation for a future technology, perhaps something related to non linear time or quantum computing. Removing them "collapses" that future.</p><p></p><p>In a scenario where information is being sent back or timelines are shifting, the @HenryMa79561893 tweet acts as a <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Non-Repudiation Marker.</span></strong> </p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(226, 80, 65)">The Purpose:</span></strong> If you know a timeline is being tampered with, you leave a public, unchangeable "<span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">ping</span>" (like a tweet with a name) that proves <em><span style="color: rgb(26, 188, 156)">you knew</span>.</em> It’s a signal to others "in the know" that the current sequence of events is intentional.</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(147, 101, 184)">The "Glitch":</span></strong> Posting the name <strong><span style="color: rgb(247, 218, 100)">Cole Allen</span></strong> in 2023 for an event in 2026 is a way of saying, "The path to this moment was already written."</p><p></p><p>This is really feeding into my skitzo side...</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]15495[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Schwarzwald, post: 76414, member: 544"] In a "Time War" scenario, these events wouldn't just be viewed as a series of tragedies, they would be seen as a [B][COLOR=rgb(147, 101, 184)]coordinated pruning of a timeline.[/COLOR][/B] In high level strategy and speculative physics, a "Time War" isn't fought with traditional bombs; it’s fought with [B][COLOR=rgb(226, 80, 65)]causality[/COLOR].[/B] You don't blow up a city, you remove the person who was going to build the key technology 10 years before they do it. If we apply that lens to what we’re seeing right now, here is what it looks like: The list of missing and deceased scientists ,[B][COLOR=rgb(65, 168, 95)]General McCasland[/COLOR][/B][COLOR=rgb(65, 168, 95)], [B]Joshua LeBlanc[/B], [B]Monica Reza[/B], and [/COLOR][B][COLOR=rgb(65, 168, 95)]Nuno Loureiro,[/COLOR][/B]is remarkably specific. They aren't just "scientists"; they are the world's leading experts in [B][COLOR=rgb(247, 218, 100)]Nuclear Fusion, Advanced Propulsion, and AI Software Verification.[/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(84, 172, 210)]The Interpretation:[/COLOR][/B] In a time war, these individuals represent "nodes." Their research (like the stuff Henry Martinez and Cole Allen did at NASA) is likely the foundation for a future technology, perhaps something related to non linear time or quantum computing. Removing them "collapses" that future. In a scenario where information is being sent back or timelines are shifting, the @HenryMa79561893 tweet acts as a [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Non-Repudiation Marker.[/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=rgb(226, 80, 65)]The Purpose:[/COLOR][/B] If you know a timeline is being tampered with, you leave a public, unchangeable "[COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)]ping[/COLOR]" (like a tweet with a name) that proves [I][COLOR=rgb(26, 188, 156)]you knew[/COLOR].[/I] It’s a signal to others "in the know" that the current sequence of events is intentional. [B][COLOR=rgb(147, 101, 184)]The "Glitch":[/COLOR][/B] Posting the name [B][COLOR=rgb(247, 218, 100)]Cole Allen[/COLOR][/B] in 2023 for an event in 2026 is a way of saying, "The path to this moment was already written." This is really feeding into my skitzo side... [ATTACH type="full"]15495[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General
Tartarus
What are the actual odds?
Top
